Message from @rip.lul

Discord ID: 792530576670195783


2020-12-26 23:10:49 UTC  

That’s not the topic I was discussing at all. That’s your topic.

2020-12-26 23:10:53 UTC  

You can use the truth derogatorily.

2020-12-26 23:10:59 UTC  

Example

2020-12-26 23:11:13 UTC  

Yeah like I said if they want a ruling in the future they should bring it up in a timely fashion and not weaponize it invalidate votes @Gypsy

2020-12-26 23:11:13 UTC  

I don’t know if I agree but I respect you’re the one who makes that decision

2020-12-26 23:11:21 UTC  

Saw that<a:groupkek:763107530229809174>

2020-12-26 23:11:29 UTC  

Again, just you deflecting from the topic I brought up.

2020-12-26 23:11:42 UTC  

You wouldn't call a mentally disabled person an R-word, no matter how true it may be.

2020-12-26 23:11:43 UTC  

Why wouldn’t they rule on a case or it is brought up appropriately @Gypsy

2020-12-26 23:11:58 UTC  

Cowards

2020-12-26 23:12:23 UTC  

I think this shit should be looked at. Am I a tinfoil boy?

2020-12-26 23:12:26 UTC  

This pairing scotus as some incompetent branch as if they didn’t do their job is just a right wing conspiracy to deal with then fact they lost the election

2020-12-26 23:12:27 UTC  

A retard?

2020-12-26 23:12:31 UTC  

No, buts that because we use the R word to describe people who we think are behaving like idiots not developmentally disabled. When it only described the latter it was acceptable.

2020-12-26 23:12:31 UTC  

@Gypsy, you just advanced to level 14!

2020-12-26 23:12:54 UTC  

You brought up a non point @Gypsy

2020-12-26 23:13:15 UTC  

You can't even call a non-disabled person a retard any more even if they're retarding the class from learning.

2020-12-26 23:13:17 UTC  

Just to confirm, you believe SCOTUS is always right 😂

2020-12-26 23:13:18 UTC  

@SoonMrWick who is a coward? Scotus for doing their job

2020-12-26 23:13:32 UTC  

For not* doing their job

2020-12-26 23:13:33 UTC  

what chapter Anitfa are you?

2020-12-26 23:13:34 UTC  

@rip.lul, you just advanced to level 10!

2020-12-26 23:13:43 UTC  

No I believe in this case they ruled appropriately and treated this garbage lawsuits as they should be treated @Gypsy

2020-12-26 23:13:53 UTC  

@rip.lul funny

2020-12-26 23:14:00 UTC  

Indeed. That's kinda the point.

2020-12-26 23:14:29 UTC  

@SoonMrWick yeah at what point did they not do their job. Did you read this garbage cases

2020-12-26 23:14:30 UTC  

So the validity is based on whether they agree with you. Makes liberal sense. Jk, jk @Maw

2020-12-26 23:14:42 UTC  

No, it's about it being derogatory or not.

2020-12-26 23:14:44 UTC  

No their validity is based on the law @Gypsy and if they followed it

2020-12-26 23:14:52 UTC  

Did you see any of the footage from the TCF arena or whatever in Detroit? I am from chicago and I assure you, that city wrote the book on corrupt politics.

2020-12-26 23:15:04 UTC  

Which in this case they did but conservatives can’t handle it @Gypsy

2020-12-26 23:15:18 UTC  

Separate topic I was just letting you know I was kidding with James.

2020-12-26 23:15:21 UTC  

@rip.lul yes that has been investigated and addressed a thousand times

2020-12-26 23:15:28 UTC  

Different conversation entirely, James.

2020-12-26 23:15:31 UTC  

resources?

2020-12-26 23:15:57 UTC  

I won’t talk about his age anymore in the public discord. Though I think the fact is relevant to the case 😂 you won’t hear another peep about it from me,

2020-12-26 23:16:03 UTC  

Yes. All the cases they are too scared to rule on because people might riot. Oh no. So stunning. So brave.

2020-12-26 23:16:13 UTC  

Thank you.

2020-12-26 23:16:41 UTC  

Do you think this was the most secure election ever? as stated by dems across the board?

2020-12-26 23:16:45 UTC  

@SoonMrWick no it’s because they were garbage cases