yea but most of what they are saying in the Trump v. Boockvar case does not even look close to be talking about the same case. I understand that they have multiple instances of the same but lets see the actual Litigation and not the narrative that they put on it. Almost as Bad as the MSM.

so 16 have concluded does not mean that just the injunctive relief was denied?

or the 6 plus pending are different than the 78?

Nice... If you scroll to the right in the tables, you will find links to the actual court cases. This is page does not provide any opinions, it is simply a free service to link people who are interested to the cases related to the election.

But thanks for trying to disparage them because the facts don't align with your ideology. Very telling.

`That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more. At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Therefore, I grant Defendants’ motions and dismiss Plaintiffs’ action with prejudice.`

nothing like that @TaLoN132 just the 3 i did look up dont look right.

`with prejudice.` Yeeowch.

Which case was that?

Trump v. Boockvar.

Judge opinion and order.

Now robert should cover this

https://thefreethoughtproject.com/good-cop-indicted-for-leaking-video-of-cops-shoving-baton-in-mans-mouth-until-he-died

He probably will be.

Fucking disgusting

just listed the one Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar seems it is sitting waiting on something but they narration on the case looks way different then what i see in the case what they have in a summery But yea next it seems to be moving forward still. But yea Nice of BP to put up a page like this makes it allot more ez to see them...

Uh, that one appears to be dismissed -- **with prejudice**.

As I've suggested with the ruling above.

https://www.pamd.uscourts.gov/sites/pamd/files/20-2078_203.pdf

`Therefore, I grant Defendants’ motions and dismiss Plaintiffs’ action with prejudice.`

This means it's concluded. Indefinitely, never to be brought up again to the court, period.

yea looking still maw why am i reading Pending on Trump v. Boockvar humm not reading this cart correctly it seems

The one on BP shows it is in the US SC - possibly on appeal filed 12/19/20 - possibly of the decision in the 3rd circuit.

Chart

@leftingfighter33 the guy in the picture looks like a midget...

Is that still okay to call people midgets?

little people

TY @TaLoN132 just trying to see why i am not seeing the same stuff than i had been looking at for the last Mo on the case. But yea looks like thats where that 1 is

I've posted it.

This will not work on appeal, almost guaranteed. This judge was very strong in his conviction.

so many different vrs Boockvar LMAO

yea with prejudice. ouch!

`This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated. One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens` Like it's a very strongly-worded opinion.

`That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence.`

That judge was big mad.

Sounds like for good reason.

It'd be very interesting to have some older dictionaries...I'm almost positive these words don't mean the same thing that they mean today....

Some words

yea that was the big one Trump chances dwindling but time will tell

Trump's chances have been close to nil for a while now.

https://techcrunch.com/2021/01/03/t-mobile-call-records-data-breach/

@ShittyKitty I'm always disappointed when my Dad Jokes are ignored... https://discordapp.com/channels/760945067107680286/771201221145919499/795377978590494730