Message from @busillis
Discord ID: 793094920336048148
That building is hardened for such attacks.
Also incredibly strange that you didn't hear any missile fly in, but you know, that would be inconvenient to conspiracy theories. I highly recommend watching actual missiles land in an area, you can hear them quite clearly, especially if they're actively burning fuel, and you know, if they are, you can see them VERY clearly in the sky.
(Especially at night!)
But this specific one must be secret government technology, a stealth missile that has a chem trail following it despite apparently not burning fuel.
because chem trails.
@Maw I was never in Lebanon, so I know how missiles sound like, and you have special silent versions. They produce only a 60 db moan.
Nato reporting name: "female crisis"
They're actually incredibly loud if they're actively burning fuel.
later developed in belarus to the completely silent PMS-111. Nato reporting name: "shaker"
Invisible burn missiles that leave chem trails, it's the only way
Also completely silent.
you have the Israeli version; אוֹרגַזמָה. Nato reporting name: "announcer"
It just gently whispers as it arrives: "I am coming..."
45 db only
Anthony Q. Warner.
Q!!!!
I see a narrative coming.
so THAT is why he went quiet
Perhaps... I just thought it's funny that his name has been presented as Anthony Q...
Q-An
no coincidence there
I'm sure there's no coincidence...
Maybe Anthony Q was Q Anon.
he was
its why the אוֹרגַזמָה-announcer was used to off him
you can see its reverse trail in the video above
Mossad
yep
obviously. The missile is silent.
and the trail goes backwards
typical for Jiddish missiles.
This is, btw, why Trump lost. The Deep state took out the Q-network.
It's the ultimate psychological operation no one ever expects the missile that travels backwards to impact.
exactly
it hides its trail until after impact
Hope it never ends
So I sense a heavy bit of sarcasm. I would like some plausible explanations if there are some in there..
Can't hear it in the video release...Who says that's the actual audio. It played the same thing for 15 minutes.
2nd the actual source of the explosion is further down the st than the rv. The blast radius seems rather elongated looking at the after math and very charred.
Do you seriously believe it was a hydrogen based source? Wouldn't there be detectable radiation if detonated and not destroyed.
I would believe there was something along those lines in the vehicle that's why it was destroyed. Could said nano H device cause an emp to scale enough damage