jk

no, Im being a medical history buff

idk its what libs always say

but while on the subject, I have been unable to find a racist.

Even after extensive searching.

oh i mean what do u define as a racist then

xD

The word was created by Trotsky, but I am beginning to think it is a myth.

Yeah no literally walked up and put my hand on a fellas shoulder(knew well friend of family)when I was a teen he turned around and punched the shit out of me. It was weird cause he was crying and I was laughing but his son had to explain it to me that he was a Vietnam vet.

woaaaaha

wah

holy shit

well, the closest I can get are some trailerpark dudes who claim they are superior due to the color of their skin, and they claim this skin to be better then all other skins and would have no other skin.

But then they turn up with an asian gf.

and she does not seem to have the same skin as them.

wait im so confused

Leading me to suspecting them of just repeating a myth.

Most of what people call racism is, insensitive stereotypes, prejudices etc. Also immature and a desire to "get someones goat" seems to play a big factor

i should be doing school work:,(

stereotypes are just the brain categorizing data.

i agree

if that is racist, all central nervous systems are "racist"

so why not just call it "neurology" rather than "racist"?

ye thats why i said define its like well i know a shit ton of racists if were being like snowflake

lol

other than that just normal ppl

"youre being so neurological! Stop it!"

they dems r like hey how about we just remove all logic

no more logos

no more God lol

anyone here happen to do accounting

Well if you wanna get super scientific each race has "evolutionary" traits that put us all over the place in tons and tons different aspects but ultimately we equal out. Things such as fast twitch muscle, immunity and vulnerability to different diseases and illnesses etc etc

no such thing as a human race. Races are used to distinguish between cohorts of bred animals.

If you want to be scientific about it and subclassify humans, the proper term would be subspecies.

Okay so shoot me on the technicality lmao

I have no idea what you mean about equal out, though. The north american wolf is slightly larger and more colored than the european wolf.

the San is slightly smaller and somewhat different colored than I am.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFooy8cLLcI&ab_channel=Guns%26Gadgets

What about bite force, life span, muscle density, bone density

all subject to biological variations, and usually a little offset between subspecies.

Which would indicate that despite an immediate marker like the larger size that the idea of superiority of any sort is just silly?