Message from @Maw
Discord ID: 788998947917660171
Not necessarily.
Because public perception of flipping the results has been tanking every day.
doesn't matter to me either way ...
Hand recounts are only as good as the person doing them. Project Veritas already released footage of people counting Trump ballots for Biden during a hand recount. In addition, the QR code on the ballot receipt is not countable in a software-independent manner. All you have is a text summary. The QR code in the machine could have registered a different vote
Public perception that the election was stolen still remains at over 90 percent for republicans and in the 30’s for libs
when they do a hand recount they have representatives there from both parties
Why delete adjudication logs in the 2020 election, when they were available for past elections? That is ginormous red flag
Clearly not, when Trump ballots still get counted as Biden ballots — get placed in a Biden pile as soon as the ballot is called out verbally
Project Veritas has a sketchy record with coverage. I'd be extremely cautious of reading into their stuff. The Assange call was a surprisingly non-partisan coverage and they released the entire thing unedited, to which I applaud them.
and as a result Republicans will likely boycott the GA senate runoff and the Dems will control the Senate
Nothing sketchy about them. They’ve won every lawsuit questioning their integrity.
The video speak for themselves
They really haven't.
Uh, yes they have.
Orly?
Yes they have
@TMDOMarie55, you just advanced to level 4!
Settlements =/= loss — If that’s what you’re gonna reach for
He has 327 retractions from other people on his wall
About project Veritas
For very minor edits.
Of course, no one looks into these bold claims of his.
And constantly repeat them ad nauseam.
That is a retraction. You make false claim, then you correct them after pressure
It is not a retraction.
A revision is a correction, a retraction is pulling a story down in its entirety.
Yes, it is. The big editor’s note saying that the article was incorrect about a particular piece of information about Project Veritas is a retraction. When somebody says James O’Keefe is a felon (He’s not), and his lawyers pressure the libelist to say said person is making false claims and to correct their statements, and the person does, it’s a retraction of the original claim
(Almost always)
That is a correction.
2.
a withdrawal of a statement, accusation, or undertaking.
That’s what these articles do.
No, we're talking about media.
Yes, media does engage in this about Veritas,By removing the false information from the article, and replacing it with something else, that is a withdrawal.
The original claim/accusation is withdrawn.
"While the terms correction and retraction are sometimes used interchangeably, in general, a correction alerts your audience to factual errors that do not take away from your main point, while a retraction informs your audience of factual errors that impact the main point of the statements."
The corrections are so substantial that they have impacted the main points of the article
Watch his retraction videos
According to who? James?
Let's not forget his self-own on the Washington Post. Yikes.