Because election interference/corruption was not needed there, and it would look more fishy if they took a state like Missouri or Wyoming. So, the Dems made no effort to corrupt the elections there.

The Government needs to look at all the machines not just the swing states

"No evidence"

The courts haven't thrown trump's shit out yet

On merits

But rather on procedural grounds

The merits have yet to be refuted.

They should, eventually. But there are time constraints. and They will not find corrupted votes there. The Dems did not steal the elections there.

And wanna know why that don't matter?

@Whithers what about Florida

You guessed it

Machines

Machine*

What about it. Florida is a red state where Brenda Snipes was already taken down.

If you wanna audit Florida

Go ahead

I'm sure trump won that

Look into it

I have no problems with that

But the left doesn't want a full proper forensic audit of Georgia

& other swing states

The Dems lost Florida by the same margins as GOP lost Michigan

That's sus

The difference is dems are credibly being accused of cheating.

Or you wanna audit Florida?

If so

Go ahead

I'm confident in that.

Texas too

Go ahead

The problem is that the discovery hasn't let them go into either blue or red states. People are focused on the swing states, but they are still fighting to establish that yes fraud occurred. ... Until that is affirmed, then they cannot start picking off claims in red or blue states.

But I'd like to audit PA

GA

AZ

WI

MI

You can keep Nevada

You can audit NC too

Go ahead

Florida is a red state bastion like Missouri. Only a couple of urban plantations swing blue.

I am just saying whats good for the goose is good for the Gander