I know but I disagree with the law. Lol

I'm just Reporting, not Endorsing.....lol

I still think my proposition is an improvement

I am for the least intervening way to restrict guns from those few outlier situations.

I think after 8 years of our current government, we can't trust them to tie their shoes, let alone be the arbiters of people's rights.

But they are though 😂

I mean until we vote for change.

And hopefully that will change.

Which is why I moderate for this channel, which I feel has a really good message in this respect, and I feel this is the way I can further the channel's popularity and reach in order to potentially reach more people with the same sort of message of accountability.

Maybe. But people don’t seem to want freedom. Just the other day a guy was really impassioned when I said I think full autos should be legal and free to buy without checks or licenses. You would have thought I had killed someone lol

Do you mean Policy Makers or Actual Policies?

I would vote for actual laws. Politicians have not been getting the job done. If one state had some common sense. Voted out minimum wage and other barriers to employment and innovation. Voted that political salaries should be capped at some percent of the median income. Voted for 2 term limit maxes. Etc

FFLs/SOTs aren't too hard to get, but in general I agree.

Full autos are only available pre 86. You get finger printed for those and CHLs here in Oregon. You give up some of your 4th amendment rights. I mean that’s a big difference to me from unlicensed firearm sales.

I have mixed feelings on Popular Vote in establishing Law. I fear the Minority getting disenfranchised or a Raw Deal?

I think you can also machine your own full auto if you did it. Like literally you. But I am not certain on the law.

Check up on FFL law.

There would still be a constitution. Can’t be that much worse than legislatures. I am speaking merely on a state level though.

I understand. As I said Mixed.

Sometimes the Easy or Obvious has unexpected Outcomes?

Instant Gratification can be misleading.

That is why Economics is called the second order science

Pre-86 is legal for people without FFLs.

I believe the Patriot Act was Instant Gratification based upon Fear as an Example.

But it’s almost always better to err on the side of no regulation and let people organizes themselves privately

Seems like the FFL is giving up a lot of rights also. I mean you get my point. People may not agree but I am not in favor of licensing or background checks generally.

The patriot act was awful. 10/10 would not endorse.

It seemed like a good idea at the time for many though!

Unfortunately

I mean, you're a patriot right?

They did the same thing with undermining the message behind the net neutrality deal.

"Save The Puppies" could just be Creative Marketing?

"You don't have to worry if you have nothing to hide." - Obummer.

"Like your Doctor, keep your Doctor"?

I was against net neutrality. And my Facebook friends hated me

I'm from the Government and I'm here to Help!

Do you want to go on Jerry Springer with me?

It's an all paid trip!

Politicians are such scammers. “My job is to make up rules I don’t follow”

Yepper. They make up rules you want, but they're 100% above the law themselves.

As much as they say they're not.