and there's not even enough people willing to buy non-botnet ISPs to make it work

muh consumer choice

worked for vidya, why not for utilities

Who here would actually buy an internet plan that didn't have access to their own website?

ISPs have already been advertising "access to the whole internet" to imply access to pornography for years.

Chances are that once NN is gone

There's going to be some stupid "Internet Basics" and "Wikipedia Zero" stuff

and barely anyone will use it because welfare internet is better

and then there's going to be like, no porn internet

and maybe some legit welfare people will be using that

and then there'll be porn+privacy plans

ur an idiot

<:GWnanamiPepeEZ:398860718088257536>

Ajit Pai is a GENIUS

His intelligence quotient is over 300.

He rides on fucking uniforms while spinning fidget spinners and doing random crap.

I mean just look at that badass.

And he even devised the world's greatest way to get government surveillance off of my computer

Doesn't get better than that

You're: A: Putting too much stock in companies to make pro-consumer "packages"
B: Accepting all too readily that companies should be able to classify and divide websites up into said packages

Or just being a trolling faggot

can't tell

Chances are that companies who actually offer decent internet won't even have "packages" because no one will actually have different internet plans.

They'll just start slowing down the biggest bandwidth hogs that cause service outages.

Slow down the sites that most people are using. Sounds smart

300 IQ!

Actually, more like just Kim Kardashian's latest porno.

or like

literally just pornhub

Clearly everyone in the entire United States needs to pay for the people who watch so much porn it causes service outages. Genius.

> implying electrical signals in a wire are a finite resource that dries up

Ever had to be on the same wifi as six dudes watching Youtube videos at the same time

and noticed that it's slow?

or like

attempted to visit a website during a DDoS attack

or anything

I have, but I fail to see how limiting users abilities to use those sites is a better solution than increasing capacity with the MILLIONS OF DOLLARS these companies rake in daily

So, by government force, you propose forcing ISPs to expand coverage to the entirety of the United States--including nearly-uninhabited regions of it--and forcing them to install Gigabit or some shit?

Are you retarded?

They're already building better internet infrastructure in most of the populated areas and such.

The problem is just that people start using more bandwidth whenever they get more access.