Message from @Luso
Discord ID: 772623114990256149
When I found out Shapiro and Prager U are funded by the Wilks Brothers, that was eye opening to get out of Con Inc
Saying he copies his entire brand and presentation from William F Buckley takes the wind out of his fast talking persona
Went to my college's college Republicans meeting this week and within 20 min they talked about how Ben Shapiro and Steven Crowder are "awesome conservatives" and also how non-whites are getting "red pilled" about how socialism doesn't work.
Needless to say, I cringed my pants.
I'm getting more involved and hopefully I'll have enough pull in about a year to start an America First Republicans chapter. There's a sizeable Republican population on campus. The leaders are kinda neo-con tho from what I've seen do far
Trumpers In Name Only
Not surprising
Maybe you can rise in the ranks and become leader of the chapter
And then move it in an AmFirst direction
My schools TPUSA chapter is run by a Pro choice libertarian
🤢
Yeah I'm aiming to lay low and become well respected and influential enough to turn it towards America First over time
It's looking pretty good because the cringe guys are all graduating and the young ones seem like they know what's up
> My schools TPUSA chapter is run by a Pro choice libertarian
@Deleted User so I guess TPUSA really is just about full libertarian now lmao
I think Jaden should start AF chapters all over the US... especially the TPUSA ones that bailed after groyper wars... college students need to get on Tucker like that SDSU guy
There's an AF chapter at my university that used to give anti-degeneracy powerpoints citing EMJ... maybe Nick is planning some infrastructure process behind the scenes
Well, heres what we gotta do.... we have to tear down the the current system and then fill ourselves into the vacuum. But the only way I can see that feasibly happening is if people like Nick and Vincent James debate Ben Shapiro and Charlie Kirk.
We could theoretically have someone larp as a leftist and than get them popular to the point where we get ben or charlie to debate and than we pull a reverse and reveal it was all to get them to debate
But that would take a LONG time to build up
I think the best thing to do is finally give a very clear, explicit, and concise definition to conservatism. Specifically American patriotism and Christian Nationalism. It seems like the GOP still has no clue what "conservatism" actually is, which is why we still have so many neo-cons co-opting it.
But I think if American conservatism were more explicitly Christian then it would repel the Zionists and Libertarians who always end up changing our message
Focus everything on classic Americana
I think fundamentally true conservatism and christian nationalism are virtually one and the same
I think so too
We just need to be explicit about it
We also gotta get these libertarians out but I think in the long run they will leave naturally
Yeah really
But we should come up with like a "ten commandments" for conservatism
I saw the comments on Don Jr's post. It's really gross. People are saying "now Libertarians don't have an excuse *not* to vote for Trump!" Like it's a good thing
I don't think a "conservative ten commandments" is really necessary when you have the original
I mean the people who subvert us break at least a few
Well.... given the situation we need any vote we can get but in the long run yeh... its not a good thing
@Luso I mean yes the original ten commandments would be a good start but im talking more explicit on political stances i.e "conservatives do not support abortion"(except possibly in the case for the physical life of the mother) meaning if you dont support this than you should not call yourself conservative
Oh yeah totally
I thought you meant literally calling them the "ten commandments of conservatism" or something lol
But you're right
Something specifically addressing policy is good
yeh basically explicitly addressing policy/policies
I think practically the most important thing for zoomers to focus on really is converting campus Republicans because that's the only thing we can realistically change rn
Though that's probably obvious