Gotcha!

https://dlive.tv/ free to view

@The Modern Conservative After the announcement from YouTube about blocking Election Fraud videos, there are going to be a number of new sites to use. I know that Rumble is going to support Live Streaming soon, per Dan Bongino. We as a Conservative movement can't be fenced in!

@Free2Think - Thanks took your advice!

dlive is mostly German speaking but if it allows live streams who cares

Every page of the TX reply is freaking AWESOME so far! LOVE IT!

Does anyone know anyone who will be in DC this weekend? TMC? We need to get petitions drafted and copied and there for voters from every state to sign in support of the Tx case. To be considered by government, petition have to have actual signatures (not electronic ones...and I do believe they have to sign and print their name) and they also have to include their address. If someone could circulate hundreds of these in DC this weekend I have no doubt 100s of 1000s of actual voters can sign in support of SCOTUS hearing the case.

A few million people should March down to DC and shut the capitol down.

💪🏽

Haha Oldguy this made me laugh. I've had the same all day lol
You can just log out and log back in whenever

I think you are going to see millions tomorrow - powerful images of boots on the ground

Lol I just turn on the notification if someone mentions me 🤷🏻‍♂️

We need to get petitions there while everyone is there. Not only would it be a great opportunity to get tons of patriots to sign in support of case, but it will also give everyone there an extra opportunity to have their voices heard. It’s also basically the last weekend to do so as SCOTUS will most probably be ready to announce their decision about the case Monday. If someone could circulate petitions and then leave them all on the door of the Supreme Court it’s possible it could make a difference in them deciding to hear or dismiss the case

Ah ok I might do that then 👍

Yea works well

Let’s gooooo

I will draft a petition and get it to you if you know someone who will be there and can copy it and circulate them

@Pablo Snaggletooth I found out that there is a Settings for comments in <#759145497134497825>_ that can turn it off. I wish there was an "Operators Guide" for Discord? LoL

Thanks, I'll try and find it 😁

https://youtu.be/7BFytSpuAWs

I can't wait to watch, been looking forward to it for weeks. Hope the PB's bump into anti fa

Have to catch them, first

@Free2Think Thanks for the link!

“Aside from the obviously tortured reasoning of this argument, there are three additional problems with Pennsylvania’s argument.” Page 9 of the Texas reply. It just gets better the more I read! Lol

NP

well you know who the real men are 💪 I'll be watching too.

“With respect to Pennsylvania’s non-legislative changes to the signature requirements of state laws, the Pennsylvania brief bends the meaning of words to the breaking point.” Page 12 Tx reply. I’m in hawg heaven y’all! Lol

Best part of their reply is they filed it less than 24 hours after the responses of the problem states (defendants). They addressed every argument every state made in detail complete with case precedents to support their argument AND explanation ms as to why the court precedents used by the defendants in their responses don’t hold water! GOD BLESS TEXAS!

Sounds very favorable

God bless Texas and America 🇺🇸

Wow! They were quick. Trump ét al were well prepared for all of this.

👏 👏 👏 👍 👍 👍 <:biden:786404256261079040> 👎

Yes i read that CA and Nevada want to secede from America, Good luck with that lol

Sign of the times!? TX AG cited a YouTube video in the reply to the defendant states responses, lol. Page 20 😂🤣😂 LOVE IT!

They even included the specific min and sec time mark for the vid 🥰

“I just want to stop the world from killing itself” - The Don <:trump:786404250061766656>

🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 Well said President Trump

“In sum, Georgia’s claim that “the State and its officers have implemented and followed” the laws enacted by the Legislature is false, but at least Georgia acknowledges in its (own) brief that it is the Legislature that has “plenary authority over voting procedures.” Georgia Br. at 11; see also id. at 12 (citing McPherson, 146 U.S. at 35). Neither Texas nor Plaintiff in Intervention Donald Trump seeks to usurp the Georgia Legislature’s plenary authority; they merely ask this Court to uphold that plenary authority against violations by non-legislative officials that have resulted in an illegal and unconstitutional election certification, to the detriment of the electoral votes legally certified in states such as Texas, and the even greater detriment to the Plaintiff in Intervention (President Donald J. Trump). 😆

Thanks

It gets better, here’s part of the response to WIs reply. According to Wisconsin, it is simply “axiomatic” that “executive branch officials, in order to carry out their constitutional function of executing statutes, necessarily must interpret the meaning of those statutes and must exercise executive judgment.” Wisc. Br. 25. By “interpret” Wisconsin evidently means “change the meaning of.” And Wisconsin claims it is “equally axiomatic ... that the executive branch’s interpretation and application of state statutes in particular situations are subject to review by the judicial branch.” Id. 26. In other words, according to Wisconsin, by being part of this three-branches-of- government arrangement, the legislature conceded the power to modify statutes to the other two branches. Under this theory, Electors Clause violations would never occur, because every change wrought by the judiciary or the executive branch always has the implicit approval of the legislative branch. Such a view would render meaningless the grant of authority to state legislatures in the Electors Clause.

Almost done y’all I promise....just sharing the meat and potatoes lol