It's very cost-effective

but it costs a lot per month

for customers

I pay $40 for 30Mbps

If anything, it would force those prices to go down

and installing fibre isnt all that cheap

it can cost quite a sum

Which in turn would be good for us customers

costs millions

Sweden had this problem who would pay for installation?

This causes monopoly which is bad

We should have transparent lines

I guess you mean the outer areas

opennet?

Heard about that for example

I've heard about it too

And it is getting implemented more and more

http://i.imgur.com/l3iDi4I.png

Power users wouldn't settle with 4G being their only network capability, though

The latency is still on the high side

And that's not really something you can fully eliminate

Unless you sit on top of the mast

But we'll see

You can use a sattelite dish to focus it onto your phone

one thing that I heard about opennet

brace for impact

operation and maintenance fee of $ 7.3 a month

however

48 dollars a month for like 200/20 Mbit/s with bahnhof, three first months 1/2 off

add $6 for 200/200

ofc they sell much higher for crazy prices, depends on the area, the price, that is.

I can imagine the maintenance fee will vary alot between different regions

With it being the highest in the outer areas

Oh yeah, topic:ing back to /csg/

I would rather pay a maintenance fee

Now that Chink powerbanks are b& by the EU, do you think it's the same for batteries?

to a 3rd party to maintain a non-monopoly net that ultimately is cheaper because competition

you get 512 kbit/s free

you can be a real jew and just pay maintenance fee for some of the cheapest shit net ever

@Aerione do you think it counts for it as a whole?

Because xiaomi was basically regular cells wrapped with TI modules for charge/discharge (cheap)