@Dietrich Not at all

Most people scramble to use up even 200 GB per month

bandwidth is almost free for them

I think that if they implemented a stratergy where they would try to get more people over to an "unlimited plan"

they could make more money than by pricewalling the GBs

but that's probably stupid, maybe they dont have that huge uplinks on the towers

but lets say they run ISPs that sell internet in said areas

I think the "unlimited" plan is there to seem exclusive

shouldnt be that hard consdiering what home users do

People who need that can strike seperate dealings with them, anyway

You can actually ask them for that when subbing

There is also this dangerous side of it

And they'll return with a receipt

imagine not having to subscribe to home net anymore

and only using celluar to pay bills and stream a bit

this could be bad

Really now?

I mean, how would it be dangerous?

they wouldn't sell the residential line

Eh

Residential line is much cheaper to setup, though

yeah

It's very cost-effective

but it costs a lot per month

for customers

I pay $40 for 30Mbps

If anything, it would force those prices to go down

and installing fibre isnt all that cheap

it can cost quite a sum

Which in turn would be good for us customers

costs millions

Sweden had this problem who would pay for installation?

This causes monopoly which is bad

We should have transparent lines

I guess you mean the outer areas

opennet?

Heard about that for example

I've heard about it too

And it is getting implemented more and more

http://i.imgur.com/l3iDi4I.png

Power users wouldn't settle with 4G being their only network capability, though