@buckwheatclark Hey dude you left your mic on

they did use the term "medium sized ammunition"

I think he turns his monitor off

or walks away

he rarely responds

Gotta use thos 1" rounds

haha really

once in a while he comes to the chat to settle an argument

but mostly it's him arguing with his parents

yeah

doesn't respond to @

he probably uses above 50 lux

damn okay

>never had a prolonged period of being single to go full autist about lighting and ppi

no one on g goes autist about lightbulbs

I got one of those chink lightbulbs

it's ugly as fuck

hey what's up

sup

you left your mic on

forever

i always forget

btw medium sized rounds with proper grain are far more efficiant at killing people than larger rounds with less gunpowder

they don't teach muricans in the south proper mic control

too busy teaching them that gays are the devil

efficent as in cost effective or how often it hits?

efficient as in it kills better

really .223 or 5.45 from the militaries of usa and russia

are about right

we're judging by maximum death per bullet

has anybody lined up some liberals to test this?

we know that liberals have softer, more spongey flesh than conservatives

might throw off the data a bit

at closer ranges lighter grains fly straighter and get better groups generally

and most militaries assume that their conflicts will be in close proximity

but that's silly imo

at what lux are these results tested in and at what ppi are you reading this info?

i just look at history of bullets

if i remeber correctly

because it could be misinformation below a certain lux

the .223 came from the .222