Lol

>not allowed

the human eye can only see a total of 24 fps

30 fps is more than enough

^lol

keep telling yourself that

the human eye can only see 29 hertz

The action of mobs in that game is tied to framerate

to be more specific

If bloodborne came to PC it would be 60fps

120hz is point of diminishing returns

They tie it to framerate because they're lazy Japanese devs

who here wait for ZEN/VEGA?

I kinda do

I'm interested in how it's gonna turn out

^

if the human eye can only see 24fps then how come 60 looks so smooth compared to 30

8350/290 here, i just want better IPC

Cause you keep telling yourself that it's smooth and you believe it

human eye can see more than 24

no way you need a 60 hz monitor

GoyWorks is a shitty suite tbh

But it's pretty <:benis:239668961011040257>

<:benis:239668961011040257> :-DDD

>people say arkham knight is broken
>boot it up out of curiosity
>average 110fps

R9 290 stronk

I like how amd's cards perform in raw power

I think the said that about the game itself

DX11 overhead kills the amd card

Yeah it didn't go beyond like 15fps at launch

>average 110fps
i'm not sure i believe you tbqh lad

I'll post benchmark result later

Does it drop in game?

The problem is software optimization

I dunno

it was stuttery as fuck when driving around

that was the main issue

so benchmark might not show that

Hmm I just ran the benchmark yeah, maybe it's worse in the shitmobile

vram usgae was fucking awful

Mine was using 3.5gb