I can't support it but at least I understand it.

Same with me ^

But I don't mean it in extreme terms, I support it when it comes to severe mental or physical disabilities

Like, life altering disabilities

It's usually a controversial topic because it's inhumane, but I understand the idea and purpose behind it

Maybe technology will advance to a point sometime in the future where it will work somehow

That would be nice

But I'm more in favor of selective breeding

In what sense?

Like, the best of the best mating to create the best children

Real talk though, survival of the fittest got us here.

So we're taking like what? Health wise? Or physical appearance wise, or everything?

Natural selection and all

Health wise

Appearance isn't as important

I can stand with that

Appearance is obviously a benefit but in no way important

Sometimes 2 perfectly healthy adults can have a child with disabilities though.

Which is where the idea of eugenics comes in

But it depends on the severity of the disability

There is testing nowadays, not sure how accurate, but it tells you whether your child will have a disability or not

I take a utilitarian view on it, so kids who would suffer from extreme mental retardation and would have to live off the state

People often bring up Stephen Hawking as a counter argument but he wasn't born disabled, he developed a degenerative disease later in life

And still was able to contribute a great deal to society

That is true

@antifasocialist Can I ask what's up with your name?

I like to make fun of commies

Ahhhhhh

Fair game

@Grim Do you live in the US?

I do

why?

Fair enough, Antifa. We're glad to have you, then

Just wondering. I'm from Canada

I'd vote Trump if I lived in the US though

Whats your favorite hockey team?

The Canucks, it's my city's team LOL

Lmaoo

When we lost in the final playoffs, my city rioted

Legit smoke bombs, burning everything down, trashing the place

Like antifa LOL over a fucking hockey game