Message from @John of Arc
Discord ID: 590003871213158418
Pinkerton... that was an influence but so was the police by sir Robert Peale and the English Bobby’s. Does that mean all police side with British law?
Not trying to be a “no man” just saying there isn’t always a connection because we find one
I will say that all corrupt roads lead to Chicago so I’ll give ya that one (Pinkerton) was probably shady
well even in banks not covered by fdic had feds show up
I was elated to see anons expounding on admiralty law the other day- did you guys pick up on it?
expanding on it or rehashing the narrative
Simply talking about the theoretical boat made me happy. Do you know what I'm talking about?
well i haven't looked into the boards in a few days to see what this was about but i do know kinda of what ur talking about in terms of admiralty law(law currently under) vs constitutional law(law we're supposed to be under)
Subject to the jurisdiction thereof
I wish I could talk to that anon
well the ds is getting nailed on both admiralty and constitutional
I'm sure things will work themselves out. But that is the crux of the problem. I have full faith. Things will be completely different soon enough
all the internet censorship....they're violating constitutional law..regardless of their 'terms of service against hate speech'
eventually back to where it's supposed to be
thats the true reason for maga ...making america constitutional-law again
That is all we are asking no?
To the letter
letter of the law ...the constitutional law
most of the 'regulations' and 'restrictions' and taxes put upon us are under admiralty law...not constitutional
admiralty law - laws of the sea
constitutional law - common law - laws of the land
ommon Law is based on God's Law. Anytime someone is charged under the Common Law, there must be a damaged party. You are free under the Common Law to do anything you please, as long as you do not infringe on the life, liberty, or property of someone else. You have a right to make a fool of yourself provided you do not infringe on the life, liberty, or property of someone else. The Common Law does not allow for any government action which prevents a man from making a fool of himself. For instance, when you cross over state lines in most states, you will see a sign which says, "BUCKLE YOUR SEAT BELTS--IT'S THE LAW.' This cannot be Common Law, because who would you injure if you did not buckle up? Nobody. This would be compelled performance. But Common Law cannot compel performance. Any violation of Common Law is a CRIMINAL ACT, and is punishable.
From the ucc connection
Admiralty/Maritime Law
This is a civil jurisdiction of Compelled Performance which also has Criminal Penalties for not adhering to the letter of the contract, but this only applies to International Contracts. Now we can see what jurisdiction the seatbelt laws (and all traffic laws, building codes, ordinances, tax codes, etc.) are under. Whenever there is a penalty for failure to perform (such as willful failure to file), that is Admiralty/ Maritime Law and there must be a valid international contract in force. However, the courts don't want to admit that they are operating under Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdiction, so they took the international law or Law Merchant and adopted it into our codes. That is what the supreme Court decided in the Erie Railroad case--that the decisions will be based on commercial law or business law and that it will have criminal penalties associated with it. Since they were instructed not to call it Admiralty Jurisdiction, they call it Statutory Jurisdiction.
The contract? The federal reserve note.
In full... I can't explain how important this is..
http://www.usa-the-republic.com/revenue/ucc%20connection.html
oh i know, john
which is why we're going after them under admiralty and constitutional law
Good, I'm to bed
well good night...i'll be hitting the shower in a bit....need to work out some pain under the shower massager
And the above is funny but true
imo, it's a trillion bullets, not 8 billion
Most likely. But more importantly, we know how to shoot
i knew how to shoot long before my oldest bro tried to take me upstate to 'learn how to shoot'
according to my dad it was 'instinctive shooting' ..something his dad had