The problem is in your view

Looking forward to your published papers, steve

I have gone over this several times. Two stars and earth in the center. Whatever the distance if we are in the center we see their light. That light meets at double the speed of light. Thus C is impossible.

I'll be the first to shake your hand after your nobel prize award... looking forward to it

If both were a LY from earth. in a single year a photon from one would meet a photon from the other. Approaching at double the speed of light.

Nobel prize is a circus act. Stinking Obama won it for nothing at all but they liked him.

So, you wont be publishing your ground breaking findings?

See you just go away from the proof. Reject it for no reason given other than I suppose you love C and Einstein as if they were your Gods.

Are you saying those two photos would not meet in a single year starting two LY apart?

Mockery will land you in ice box

Lots of claims about me... not sure where I said anything like that.

Mockery is asking what people will do with their information?

What is clear mockery:

"So, you wont be publishing your ground breaking findings?"

It was a pretty simple question - if you claim to have new information that goes against mainstream science, what do you do with that info?

Instead of providing anything you mock.

I've made no claims, just asking about your info

Did I claim anything you are asserting? Or are you strawmanning me?

What are you talking about

If my Government and Corporate bosses did not exist? They do exist. They control Science which is simply religion. You have a God his name is Lucifer/Nimrod.

@Steve Angell he's not doing anything wrong as far as i see it. the burden of proof is still on you. he's just implying you to show some kind of evidence of your claims

How is this not defamation - "You have a God his name is Lucifer/Nimrod."

@Hamburger Guy speed of light

I provided the proof. You rejected it with no explanation. Because there is no valid explanation.

You did no research on the subject. You wouldn't know what he means, I understand what he means

Two lights approaching each other approach at double the speed of light. Simple and easy.

That is only relative

But the absolute speeds are the same nonetheless

all i saw was a proposition. no links no nothing

^^ welcome to ice wall lol

So you are saying use the fake law of Einstein to prove his fake law is real? How is that not Circular Reasoning?

@Cosmonaut! at least 24/7 they give links.

So, steve, you CANT publish your new information because the govt controls science? that is your claim?

@Wendigo 24/7 is absolute yikes-ville

An underground scientific journal sounds like my cup of tea

Who's willing to start one

That is their only explanation. Well by the law propose it could work if you do not look at it with pure logic. Circular reasoning is never valid.

he didn't say anything like that. he said as far as we know. the speed is relative and the same. unless you can show us a paper of yours

Its a misrepresentation of hamburger's argument... which they are now running with. Welcome to ice wall

That is part of the theory of relativity the other part is C is a constant.