Message from @AnUnknownRider
Discord ID: 605029450694000670
Sigh
are there any proof of god or jesus existing?
@Alexandre Yes there is. Jesus is the biggest historical figure
oh god
Jesus did exist but the chances of him doing the miricales are low and he wasn't white rather and an new at some stage
@Tejiu The Gecko There's a site called suttacentral.net, That has a lot of the Pali Canon of Buddhist texts on it.
So you could go and try the translations from there
However there are sadly still a lot of Buddhist texts that have yet to have a translation, Mostly within the Chinese canon of Buddhist texts.
I will check it out thank you
No problem 😃
Oh and as a side suggestion, There's another side called Dhammatalks, And on that site are a good number of essays and i think also commentaries on some Buddhist texts, So if you want, You could try it too.
Will do as well!
First I need to finish a google drive book I just found about Irish mythology
Oh really?
What's it called?
I actually have the link for it right here it is also about the religions and how it have evolved and such
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Uhgm4YxCp6fPVg1jLdBBQXpu0T6E0ca7/view
Interesting
Well i'll have to take a look at it then.
Thanks!
No problem
You gave me something and I give you something lol
Fair trade
@AnUnknownRider also if you are more into mythology there is this nice one of Japanese mythology creatures and other things
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1udihTAUJeA-VhwgtNLKa6cBwr27oXh8a/view
Mhmm
@Tejiu The Gecko Indeed i am.
Thanks again!
?
there is probably good in it, but beware of leaven
Leaven?
Deceptions.
Meh, Personally i'd just read the Bible itself.
But to each is his own 🤷
There are many versions. Some are better than others depending on several things for some people.
The KJV uses old words and it difficult for many to read. Also the translation is not all that good. Words chosen with little true meaning so hard to know what passages mean. It also uses verses that most manuscripts do not support.
Though those who love the KJV will dispute what I said. They will for example point out many manuscripts exist, based on all the same but many of them. I find that meaningless. Sure the Catholics made a lot of copies but they are all the Catholic Latin version.
Well i don't really care on the changes, I'm not picky on that, The only reason why i don't read, Nor necessarily like the KJV other than for it's historical value is due to the reason you pointed out above, It has a more difficult nature in reading it and also, The lack of a true meaning on some of the words.
That's why i personally just stick to the GNB or WEB versions for the canonical parts of the Bible.
I use E-Sword on the PC My-Sword on Android. This way I can see the Hebrew and Greek words and what they mean. I prefer the CJB when just reading it. But can still find text better in the KJV as I used it for so many years before considering other versions.