At least his name describes him

hahahaha

Magical sheep

you see the article from texas calling vaccines sorcery

No i didnt

But ive been calling it alchemy

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-05-11-texas-rep-rips-big-pharma-shill-parental-rights.html

Texas rep rips big pharma shill: ‘parental rights mean more to us’ than vaccine ‘sorcery’

hahahaha

they also forget natural news put links to the sources in the articles they write

they like to call him antiscience because he goes against the mainstream narrative

it is far from it hahaha

uses more science than your side does

real science

cause he does not hide the truth about the things the government wants to hide from you

@「阿波根うみこ」 http://humansarefree.com/2019/04/science-pioneer-99-of-modern-scientific.html what is real science to you

@「阿波根うみこ」 hahaha you believe in pseudoscience

“People just don’t do it,” Wharton School professor and forecasting expert J. Scott Armstrong told Brietbart.com after making the shocking claim that less that one percent of papers published in scientific journals follow the scientific method.

“Advocacy research is the bulk of these 99 percent of non-scientific studies and they’re not done for scientific development, they’re done to support a political idea. If you want to make money in universities these days, you publish papers that support global warming and you live handsomely.”\

“[Scientists] cheat. If you don’t get statistically significant results, then you throw out variables, add variables, [and] eventually you get what you want,” he concluded.

yea you do BELIEVE in PSEUDOSCIENCE

less than 1% of what you believe is actual science

kinda like this

keep putting values in till you get what you want

“[Scientists] cheat. If you don’t get statistically significant results, then you throw out variables, add variables, [and] eventually you get what you want,” he concluded.

@「阿波根うみこ」 lol the main article came from breibart hahaha they list their sources like natural news

and just cause some government funded rag tag magazine put something out there like forbes which is run by big pharma then you understand

forbes get all kinds of funding from big pharma from ads in their magazine so if they publish stuff against the big pharma they lose their funding lol

come back any time with a real argument cause you guys have not given me one yet i cant shoot down

mediabiasfactcheck seems to be the ones who need to be fact checked hahahahaha

https://mobile.twitter.com/stutzy6/status/618111447604662273

Only a matter of time till these guys will be getting forced injections

Lets see how they feel when they are forced

https://www.naturalnews.com/032558_flu_shots_wear_off.html yea that graph you posted shows you should get the flu shot every year hahaha and you should only get 1 in your whole entire lifetime if any at all

funny thing is i NEVER get the flu shot and i dont get the flu hmmmm

i had chickenpox when i was a kid along with the measles and so did all my friends when i was a kid and no one ever died

flu shot is even not that effective and doesn't make that much of a significant difference

you only die from those things if your body is already compromised in the first place

and guess what i will never get the measles or chickenpox again but those who have had the vaccines instead can not say the same

@「阿波根うみこ」 i know why they say so but that is bull shit srry