Jeff bezos is a hella rich guy that would not benefit from the cia. And he deserves the money because who doesnt like amazon

Ok bye have fun spreading your cult. Best of luck my friend

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-05-10-fbi-targeted-dr-suzanne-humphries-vaccine-truth.html

they have black ops division like monsanto so yea they lie go read the new articles in the gmo section and how they silence the ppl who tell the truth

enjoy your lies

Allright I will. And you enjoy yours then

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-05-09-if-you-are-using-amazon-alexa-in-your-home-you-are-an-incredibly-stupid-person.html

to make a stronger immune system, certain nutrients are important. Vitamin C especially. Vitamin A for the case of measles.
Their effect is only significant when megadosing on them (doses you cannot get from a diet (would ya eat 1000 oranges?))

to another point, I think there would be more solutions to certain problems. If you want vaccines to have a better reputation, it's important to look for a program to prevent vaccine injury. Those who administer it don't administer it in the right way for some cases. Therefore they should be given instructions if they do for the first times they administer it.This is just part of the solution. Another part would be the use of laboratories, to prescreen for risks of vaccine injury. This would rightfully justify medical exemptions. Not to mention that it's not required in some cases, especially if the disease would be mild and for cases when blood titers have proven.

https://archive.fo/3u03E
https://archive.fo/VzamZ
https://archive.fo/QEAnS

Mandating it still not the solution. Doctors should also ask where it exactly was administered in order to determine if incorrect administration is the cause

what the sources got wrong and even the authority is about what is present in some of them. For some, cases happened without the knowledge behind it's mechanism of side effect. For others it applies through the use of multiple scientific studies and to connect them through logically relating them

aluminum for instance is already known to be neurotoxic, in two forms when undissolved:
causing inflammatory response (in (central) nervous system)
and whether it dissolves or not, then it's about excitotoxicity

aight but there has never been a "recorded case" of "vaccine injuries" @Lancelot

so why have some cases been compensated?

lmao, it's because of marketing. also fake news.

furthermore, absence of evidence =/= evidence of absence

and where is the "evidence" for the "compensation"

https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/index.html

here's the website you're looking for

http://prntscr.com/npw1nw

The only reason why someone SHOULDN'T get vaccines is that if they're:
Having chemotherapy
and AIDS or HIV

there are more reasons to, based on how the cases happen. The cases you've shown have good reason for not doing it

other reasons are:
allergy/sensitivity to some ingredients in vaccines (for polysorbate 80 for instance)
using immunosuppressive drugs
being sick for a long time (could worsen after vaccination, as further activation of the immune system can worsen the symptoms)

If you have 10 million vaxxed children, only 100 or 0.001% of those 10 mill kids will have an allergic reaction.

still worth no, no matter how much the percentage is

it would otherwise be an application of collective utilitarianism, which is about favoring the majority

If you repeat the same experiment with unvaxxed children measles kills around 25 thousand children and 2.5 million suffer from semi serious side effects from measles. And pneumonia kills 12k children alone. And kids who beat measles will have a severely damaged immune system that needs lots of time to regenerate, leaving space and time for other diseases to attack and harm the immune system even further.

Also, 100 children getting mild side effects or 2.5 million getting actual serious side effects from measles?

Pick.

first of, this is a false dichotomy as you can prevent those 100 cases. Secondly that 2.5 million is based on other factors too.
You would force me to choose the 100 children case

How is it a "false dichotomy"?

since there isn't much looking into other details that also (may) play significant roles.

And yes, those 100 cases CAN be prevented. I'm just talking about the actual "vax injuries".

They can be prevented by..

You guessed it.

Vaccines.

nope

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBkVCpbNnkU

Watch this video in it's entirety.

those 100 cases can be prevented by prescreening and medical exemption