Message from @ZeroT
Discord ID: 592754465379975170
But there is no study saying gmo's are bad for us
At least no cause and effect studies that have at least two branches
Which is needed for a scientific claim
Now, I am very well read about the pathology of alzheimers
I don't know if you are @Wretch . If you want I am willing to explain the pathology of alzheimers, the genetics behind it and everything you need to know to see, that this bald claim is not true
I think on europe they are actually connecting aluminum to Alzheimer's. Not from vaccine but from antiperspirant and non stick pans mainly. They have banned antiperspirant sales in Germany. Still thats just kind of side note not really worthy od conversation
Yes, aluminum in its metal form
But the connection to alzheimers is doubtfull
Big shocker! Mailchimp is a “CDC Foundation partner,” which means it’s just another pro-vaccine front corporation
Why would Mailchimp bother to get involved in trying to regulate what types of newsletter content it sends out for its clients, you might be asking? Well, as it turns out, Mailchimp is a CDC Foundation “partner,” which means it’s directly tied to the corrupt, vaccine-pushing Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. So, naturally, any newsletter content that defies the decrees of the CDC is now in “violation” of Mailchimp’s “Terms of Use.”
Now
You did again just use that source that is nowhere near being scientific
Do you know what alzheimers is and how it happens?
you trust ppl that have a conflict of interest
peroid
so your sources are tainted
not trustable
Do you know how scientific work works?
yea do you
Like I am just trying to be nice to you and you just insult me
Like, I wanted to explain alzheimers to you
“People just don’t do it,” Wharton School professor and forecasting expert J. Scott Armstrong told Brietbart.com after making the shocking claim that less that one percent of papers published in scientific journals follow the scientific method.
doubt you even know waht scientific method is
“What’s happening now is, government research, universities — they’re asking for what I call advocacy research. They have something, they want you to prove it, make sure you prove it, [and when] you do, you keep getting paid,” he said in a separate article on Breitbart.com.
“Advocacy research is the bulk of these 99 percent of non-scientific studies and they’re not done for scientific development, they’re done to support a political idea. If you want to make money in universities these days, you publish papers that support global warming and you live handsomely.”
hmmm sound familiar
“[Scientists] cheat. If you don’t get statistically significant results, then you throw out variables, add variables, [and] eventually you get what you want,” he concluded.
so lets get this straight over 99% of so called scientific papers introduced in scientific journals are nothing but pseudoscience to push a agenda
J. Scott Armstrong (born March 26, 1937) is an author, forecasting and marketing expert,[1][2][3] and a professor of Marketing at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. He also serves as a Policy Expert at the Heartland Institute, a conservative and libertarian public policy think tank
Ohhh
So this dude has the expertise to tell you how science works
A dude that eaches marketing
Interesting
hahaha you are missing the point
Now
Infkuenza vaccines are not mandatory childhood vaccines