Message from @ZeroT
Discord ID: 592755700178878475
you trust ppl that have a conflict of interest
peroid
so your sources are tainted
not trustable
WTF
Do you know how scientific work works?
yea do you
Like I am just trying to be nice to you and you just insult me
Like, I wanted to explain alzheimers to you
“People just don’t do it,” Wharton School professor and forecasting expert J. Scott Armstrong told Brietbart.com after making the shocking claim that less that one percent of papers published in scientific journals follow the scientific method.
doubt you even know waht scientific method is
“What’s happening now is, government research, universities — they’re asking for what I call advocacy research. They have something, they want you to prove it, make sure you prove it, [and when] you do, you keep getting paid,” he said in a separate article on Breitbart.com.
“Advocacy research is the bulk of these 99 percent of non-scientific studies and they’re not done for scientific development, they’re done to support a political idea. If you want to make money in universities these days, you publish papers that support global warming and you live handsomely.”
hmmm sound familiar
“[Scientists] cheat. If you don’t get statistically significant results, then you throw out variables, add variables, [and] eventually you get what you want,” he concluded.
so lets get this straight over 99% of so called scientific papers introduced in scientific journals are nothing but pseudoscience to push a agenda
J. Scott Armstrong (born March 26, 1937) is an author, forecasting and marketing expert,[1][2][3] and a professor of Marketing at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. He also serves as a Policy Expert at the Heartland Institute, a conservative and libertarian public policy think tank
Ohhh
So this dude has the expertise to tell you how science works
Interesting
hahaha you are missing the point
Now
Infkuenza vaccines are not mandatory childhood vaccines
So claiming they still use mercury in childhood vaccines but they use it in influenza vaccine sonly makes no sense
so lets get this straight it was 75 scientist that made up the 97%
not is it not it is in the flu vaccines too
and others
the article i posted shows how the manipulate the numbers too
they do this in all fields
not just climate change
Okay then
i think 30000 is way more than 75
but the media pushes the 75s ideas not the 30000
why?????
it is called propaganda and this is how they push it
Because you use false information of non scientific sources
But whatever