Message from @RidleyChozo
Discord ID: 600886883886694410
usually there are three things I see in these types of debates
1.) the usage of the word "scripture", whether it be science or religion, to affirm someone's believe as correct
2.) Usage of condescending tones and constant affirmation of ones belief
3.) The misuse and misunderstanding of the connotation and/or denotation of the English language
Of course I'm collecting bits and pieces for more points I see
but all will be addressed in my eventual essays on the topic
Again you completely avoided answering my questions and instead are trying to inject or superimpose or redefine what you think I meant by the verbiage I chose to use. I meant precisely what I said there is and was no nefarious intent in what I said to you. It was trying to nail down what you believe 100%.
^ point 4 which I can't think of a name to describe it
I just need more time
kinda hard to compete against people who've studied for longer than you've been alive
I'll get to it within the next few months
Going forward don't try to read into or redefine the language I used to fit your argument. Thanks friend.
:thumbs:
wait what
👍
got it
!rank
<:XMARK6:403540169992568833> **IS_EARTH_FLAT?**, this command is disabled in this channel
Oof
aren't all those pictures with divergent rays altered pictures
they don't look like it was taken by a cellphone
and that cardboard divergent illustration
the beams look *way* too bright with the hand being still illuminated
the light source to have pure white beams would have to be really powerful
or have to go through a fog
to see the beams better which I'm going to assume here
what you're describing are crepuscular waves
here's an example
are you sure that isn't just the tide moving in
idk how long that timelapse is
another image of the rays
as seen from above ^
Shining through openings in clouds (particularly stratocumulus[citation needed]) or between other objects such as mountains, these columns of sunlit scattering particles are separated by darker shadowed volumes. Despite converging toward the light source, the rays are essentially parallel shafts of sunlit and shadowed particles. Their apparent convergence in the sky is a visual illusion from linear perspective. This illusion is the same as railway lines' or long hallways' appearing to converge at a distant vanishing point.
here's an explanation
i can get sources if you need them