yes if wind isn't protected against, then it's not the cavendish experiment

And hom showing a childs experiment and comparing it to the real experiment

Brian the science man, is a pseudoscientist.

This is so painful.

It was an 18th century

Shed

I barely consider his claim

An 18th century shed that should have been airtight, yes?

And in all likelihood, it was not.

Well atleast air tight from large amount of wind yra

doesn't have to be airtight

But maybe it had a hole in it

just good enough to prevent wind from affecting the results

besides he always saw an attraction

Whenever the cavendish Experiment is attempted to be repeated in an air tight container, guess what happens?

widn would blow it in random directions

Nothing.

prove it

b/c we have papers showing you're wrong

Still it wouldnt make it oscillate from just wind

You can’t prove to me the Experiment was ever successful. I don’t have to disprove what you can’t prove.

of course we can

it's been repeated

Sure. Yes, claims are the same as proof to you.

I mean 20th century college rooms are air tight

no, but scientific experimental results are good proof

I went to Neptune in my cardboard box rocket.

Ok

There. Proof.

.

Because I claimed it happened.

@Derek Nelson how would you prove to me you went to the top of mt everest

or hawaii

i've never been to either

Or more like he had multiple scholars there to confirm the results

Because the medium we travel to get there is already possible. Can you do the same in a vacuum space environment?

NOPE.

yes you can

In your imagination. 🌈

many have https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_tourism

No you need a medium but you can contain a medium