Did you know that

The earth is a cube

all of you STOP!

THE EARTH IS A DONUT

Ugly rats

ARGAAAAAAAAAARRRHHHHHH

BLVLDOEOEEELBLBLBLBLBLBLBEEEEEEE

!mute @Narto Runner Trolling

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> **Central Inteligance Agency#6652** was muted
```
reason: Trolling
```

no the earth is clearly a cube

you moron

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @DXM has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```

Earth round as a bitchhh

open your eyes centar @centar

>>mute @centar

<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully muted **centar**#9017

opinion on the armenian genoice

opinion on how all anime girl skirts look like jet turbine engines

**proof:**

it took me so long to dig up that image

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435938425196249108/580763057441996811/image0-58-1.jpg

!move successful

❌ **You have to be in a voice channel to use this command.**

Big bang is supported but only really 2 pieces of evidence define it. Red shifted galaxies (which makes sense) tell us the waves are spreading out because its moving and out because its moving away. If you have questions see the experiments where people play notes on trains. Sound and light are both proven waves. And we can actually measure somehow using galaxies that we are accelerating (but in a negative direction (which means slowing down)) so if masses attract so should mass in the universe should attract eventually and eventually collapse which supports a center. I will say i dont think it will close in that fast though because

Fg=Gm1m2/r2

So yes there is attraction but its like millions of light years of distance that is increasing very rapidly

I think th problem is people think the fast universe reverses direction and reverses speed but thats not really how physics works, it will exceptionally slowly accelerate once it reaches zero speed most likely and kinda drag on later

Which leads me to doubt it would take less than a second and leads me to think a heat death could happen before this. I heat death would basically break atoms for expansion because of pressure of space to fill in the expansion. But as soon as all mass breaks the gravity is gone so it would make sense that if this happened before peak expansion, it wouldnt be able to collapse which makes me iffy on which of the two to support. Im sure Einstein supporters would find problems because of einstein being smart and this cant only bw basic physics but that is my theory Back to the point and off of ranting i think its because of the lack of solid evidence; we only really use 2 pieces after all

*Heat death oversimplified for space

Show me a picture of this galaxy of yours.

@the21cat

In all honesty, this isn’t a debate you’re having. You’re theorizing based on assumption. Massive ones.

This galaxy? I think you mean multiple galaxies. We are only in one and cannot accurately see our own galaxy

Its like saying look at your face without looking in a mirror

You’ve seen these galaxies first hand?

@the21cat ?

Yeah the adromeda

Crab nebula and hercules

Thats all but more are visable especially with a bigger telescope

You mean you’ve observed it yourself, or are you talking about images like these?