Ill believe you

You have the burden of proof for your claim. I dont have to disprove unicorns.

Gravity doesn’t have hard proof that it exists.

😃

Funny how you cite burden of proof when it suits you...

It does.

earlier you guys were saying I don't have to back up my claims

in the vc

Yeah

Let's not end up having a theological conversation

You dont have to back up your claims

Because in the end of the day both flat earth and globe earth require divine intervention

I really could care less

So, by admission, burden of proof does not matter Z

so why are you citing burden of proof?

If you have it then present it

I'm just saying I'm not worried if you don't .

Doesn't effect me.

there is no definitive proof of gravity

that's not how science works

It requires research

And needs to be looked into

not to mention, gravity is just a label we assign to that particular force

@Derek Nelson look up scientific definition of theory, then come back to me

Theory is a hypothesis that holds up in testing pretty well

The law of gravity within the theory of relativity isn't even a good theory and shouldn't even be taught in schools.

Albeit an open to interpretation term

But still not a guess

we don't teach relativity in schools but ok, because relativity is too complex for high schoolers

we teach the basic stuff, like E=MC squared

but getting into special and general relativity becomes more complex the deeper you go

Lol do you even know what that meand

@Derek Nelson Way to misinterpret his quote there, guy

it's saying YOU do not understand it if you can't explain it simply. It's not saying that the theory itself is false because it's not simple

Ah yes. Perhaps some would say that’s quote mining?

Relativity. The fabric of space time is taught in college level and its a joke

"it's a joke"

please explaion