Mass applies to weight. Density applies to mediums

That test was proven falsified.

Anyways I'm out

lol

avoiding

bye

"That test?"

there's a nice video from TSG physics which demonstrates the ball and coin effect

two objects of different masses fall at different rates inside of a tube filled with air

once a vacuum is created, the objects are dropping again inside the tube

they fall at the same rate

besides the popular cox video, there are a multitude of videos proving the same experiment

there is no need to avoid the test as it can be ignored for the sake of the argument

the argument here is that it was falsified

with replicated experiments littered on the web, it is safe to say that this experiment is thoroughly tested to be true

^ exactly

High school science classes debunk this all the time.

as for buoyancy being the cause of gravity, that cannot be correct as buoyancy depends on the gravitational constant to work

buoyancy has no vector

gravity exists

prove it

The tides.

the majority thinks it exists

u are making the claim it doesnt

so

u prove it

I'm appealing to mainstream science's explanation for tides, which is a gravitational "tug" from the moon as it orbits the earth. If you have a better explanation for the tides, I'm all ears.

are u talking to me?

No, just following up to my other post, sorry steveman.

It was directed at umwhat

oh kk

me to

i'd like to discuss the origin of the firmament theory

aside from the bible, where did this idea originate from

i think someone thought that the earth was flying through a medium, and that was called the firmament

the earth does not move

the firmament was there since day 2 of Creation

'aside from the bible,'

Aside from the bible, are there other interpretations of the origin of the firmament

I'd like to set religion aside for this and want to see what other scientific observations led to this conclusion

it's one thing to say what we understand is created from our religion, it's another to say exactly why