@97 Eleven always something weird like that

@BelgianBastard/Charles_McCnaller if the gravity causes tides why aren't there any tides in smaller bodies of water

Like freshwater bodies per example

Water sticks to anything @citizen I thought u knew physics but clearly have not heard of the cohesive force of water

Little odd that gravity has decided to be selective

Size matters @97 Eleven

Or is this just evidence of pseudoscience

It does have an effect

@BelgianBastard/Charles_McCnaller the same gravitational pull should be exerted on all bodies of water

Just to small for you to see in a glass of water

The moon should cause tides on seas

And the sun

Never said it does not

Just saying 😃

You presume it does not

@BelgianBastard/Charles_McCnaller then why is it so negligible compared to an ocean

Show me in an experiment, a perfect sphere, being spun enough to make it turn oblate, yet have water stick to the top and bottom of it.

Then i will believe you. @BelgianBastard/Charles_McCnaller

In fact, if we go off newton's model this would cause inconsistencies

Cause you want the earth to be small (like someone else explained they need to feel special and therefore the universe must ne small) but the size difference is just mindboggling big between an ocean and a glass of water or a water tub. Also a small.lakr is a small container, while the oceans are connected containers spanning the globe, those room for those humongous bodies of water to move....

@Citizen Z look through a telescope to titan. Do you know why I ask this?

If the sky has balls we must live on a ball

My favorite logic

No not because of that

See I specifically asked titan...

@BelgianBastard/Charles_McCnaller not talking about a glass of water, I'm talking about large seas and bodies of water that have negligible or no tides

You want proof of a spinning ball with liquids on it.... look towards titian. It has large large lakes and spins and nothing flies of it

Ofcourse I could be dealing with projection type fellas in which case this is useless

And now I guess frantic Google searches for debunking titan are going on.... really if you know 0hysics you have also seen a lot about planets and moons and should have know titan has large liquid lakes with even less dense material then water in liquid form there. Which also poses problems for the buoyancy hypotheses of some flat earthers.....

Show me a picture you took of titan

Oh show me a picture of a flar earth you took first

With your powerful telescope

Again a fallacy

The generic fallacy

Works both ways

Every picture of earth shows ots flat

So you have no pictures of titan?

What picture did you take of flar earth ?

Not a horizon one please

Every picture i ever took shows earth isnt a ball

Now lets see your titan picture

Lool no I will not go down that road. You ask a planet with liquids, then look toward titan