Message from @A$AP Chloee
Discord ID: 603627452727558144
The Big Bang
maybe someone else will explain
To make predictions about the cosmic background reduction
Radiation
So they are just assuming
No..
no.
They’re making predictions about it
Precise ones
they are backed up by scientific evidence
How do u know it’s precise
wha
do you want me to pull out another wikepedia article?
Scientists lie don’t they? Just like they lie about how carbon dating is legit
Here
Also
Radiometric dating valid
stop making claims, read things over and **then** make a proper claim
Carbon dating is an excellent well proven method to determine age of organic matter
I prefer potassium argon but whatever
Uranium works too
those sources explain things better than we do
@NickC64 that’s what I did, then I made a claim that carbon dating is not legit
Potassium argon because you know all the daughter elements are from the potassium
Since argon has low reactivity
alright, then, lay out your arguments
i've been talking for too long
Why trust a dating method to date thousands of year in the past when we can’t date something of today
@A$AP Chloee can you continue the debate for me
😢
sure
I know it doesn't matter much whether this is continued but at least it can convince some people
@PhumoZTYPE we can date things today
What’s your issue with radiometric dating
?
It’s not accurate, I read an article from 1975 of a freshly killed seal and it was dated to have lived about 2000 years in the past
1975?
It’s not accurate