Message from @A$AP Chloee
Discord ID: 603628284147662849
Here
Also
Radiometric dating valid
stop making claims, read things over and **then** make a proper claim
^
Carbon dating is an excellent well proven method to determine age of organic matter
I prefer potassium argon but whatever
Uranium works too
those sources explain things better than we do
@NickC64 that’s what I did, then I made a claim that carbon dating is not legit
Potassium argon because you know all the daughter elements are from the potassium
Since argon has low reactivity
alright, then, lay out your arguments
i've been talking for too long
Why trust a dating method to date thousands of year in the past when we can’t date something of today
@A$AP Chloee can you continue the debate for me
😢
sure
I know it doesn't matter much whether this is continued but at least it can convince some people
What’s your issue with radiometric dating
?
It’s not accurate, I read an article from 1975 of a freshly killed seal and it was dated to have lived about 2000 years in the past
1975?
It’s not accurate
Pick something a little more recent
Yeah
Yes
so you base your opinion on one single article?
Any source to this article?
What makes you think it’s precisely accurate in 2019 when we still can’t go back to the moon after 50 years
What has the moon landings with this subject to do?
My point is the tech of today cannot date things accurately
Radiometric dating gets more and more accurate as we get better at it
Yes it can
It’s dated rocks to 1% margin of error
There will always be error bars
But the point is is it’s extremely precise
Study a little how we use radiometric dating
I have