Message from @Gazorpazorpfield
Discord ID: 577248769234436096
so the current is changing every moment to compensate for the suna nd moons movements
magic bro
<:trolled:555217274907262976> NASA: It is the sun and moon moments hehehe
<:trolled:555217274907262976> NASA: Not every moment they touch the water it will make tides
As normal there tends to be flaws in the government
And these scientists so called "facts"
flaws is a nice way to put it
i dont trust scientists
why not?
@Gazorpazorpfield The question isn't "why not?" but why?
why don't you trust scientists?
astronauts are people and people lie all the time sometimes for nothing
From time to time and again and again we are shown they lie about the smallest things just to make the mainstream model work
sorry scientists are people and people lie
what do you think they are lying about?
lots of things
Tons of things
evolution global warming cosmology
archeology
medicine
i mean idk i could make a huge list for u
What about it?
didnt a bunch of fake papers just get accepted through peer review
isn't peer review designed specifically to stop the liars from getting through?
they made thousands of fake scientific papers and they were accepted in peer review i believe
heaps of incorrect papers last for years without a good peer review yeah
You are saying that like authority couldn't easily push them through anyways
gg
someone leveled up
i dont think peer review works
its one of you
It's fairly simple to do so and yeah I don't think it works either
@Gazorpazorpfield you reached level 1
...
@Barqos wheres ur chunkz pic
idk the exact stats but it's something like 50% are found to have issues after being peer reviewed iirc, it's higher in some areas like medicine and psychology but I don't know the exact numbers
the good thing about peer review is anyone can publish a counterpoint f they find an issue with the study, so it has an in-built mechanism for self correction
It's more about the community of science and astronomy that should be getting looked at more and then people could probably be a little more honest about it
didnt a whole bunch of face scientific papers get accpeted by peer review before
fake scientific