^

It's important to look at what we should expect to see before declaring that it's not there

and we see it nowhere

Unless you get the precision you need to see it

that's your claim

Not seeing something in a place where you don't have the precision to measure it doesn't really prove anything

I know

im thinking 2 people on earth calculating the distance to the sun would come up with the excat same distance for the moon

burrito planet sounds like heaven

Holy shit. I had no idea controlled opposition

Oh are you talking about just measuring its angular size?

FECOre is fake?

triangulating the distance to the sun on earth with 2 people

the trig problem

?

They haev a 501c(3) and are obligated under law to protect the mainstream narrative

Oh that's a 3rd different thing ok

Could you explain what you're talking about a little bit more?

i heard reds rheteric before finding the distance to the sun with 2 people on earth

https://youtu.be/pNRXUgpTmBY

What result did he get?

501C4 is tax exemption.

i forgot prolly 93 million miles

i cant find thatvideo again

Rottencore?

but the process he used you would have gotten the same distance to the moon

What process?

2 people different areas measure the angle to the sun at the same time

somethin like that

Hello

How are we all

Using parallax?

idk imma have to find the video

We used lasers to detect moon

Distance

i dont like that dude i only heard him doing that cause he was debating a flat earther

@Star Speckled Mantle 🌟 "ping"

sharks with laser beams

ah yes

`but the process he used you would have gotten the same distance to the moon`
i guess the only way you can know that is if you take a second person and try and apply it to the moon

we used lasers to detect the distance to the moon but the laser beam reflectors is proof of the moon landing