Is that antarctica

Allegedly

The second

That's the thing, we can't tell.

I mean where else would you find that

The north pole?

Yeh

Who wants to talk some shieeet

I don't think it's a very provable thing. That's largely anecdotal evidence.

Pretty good

Oh, come now. The earth would be tiny if that curve was accurate.

How does lens work

:^)

Do try to keep it relatively realistic.

We don't live on animal crossing

<:GWcztMUM:398883142460768266>

Shouldn't curve at low altitude

Wait. It never curves

^

<:ragelaugh:473547202401140766>

Well it always curves even at low altitude but it’s just really hard to see

130k feet. No curve

I would agree that this could be due to lens distortion

Your lord Neil deGrasse Tyson says you can't see the curve until you're in space

Are you smarter than your lord?

That’s just intellectually dishonest to quote NDT

HAHHAHAAA

The man you all hate

<:unsee:518873814877077519>

Not in the second image. That curve is massive as fuck. It even gets most extreme just a tad bit off center to the left. That's a damn near a point. Not a gradual, uniform curve.

But quote when he says something seemingly convinient

You like NASAs footage where Florida takes up 1/3 of the face of the Earth?

You can’t use NDT as evidence that’s just intellectually dishonest

You know everything he says doesn’t agree in the slightest bit with your stance

Don't get tricked by cartoons balls. They are obviously hiding land. Doesn't work on a small ball

Just as you can't use Google earth as evidence since it's a digital rendering.

<:ragelaugh:473547202401140766>

Can you replicate what the ISS sees?

The ISS. The place where they got caught hundreds of times messing up their green/blue screen