Message from @Wiggles
Discord ID: 580609246870241291
oh
That is an entirely flat table.
if the table obscures the dominos, then no, it isn't
or if it obscures the car wheels, the table isn't flat
It’s a completely flat table. Just like any found in a household kitchen.
i can conceive of a table not being flat
You can do it yourself.
yeah and when i use flat surfaces, i can't hide objects behind the flat surfaces
**Question Of The Day #86**
Is predictive programming being used to soften up the public for traumatic events?
Share your thoughts in the <#484514023698726912> 😃
you and me on a perfectly flat gym floor @Derek Nelson . Stand somewhere where i can't see your shoes, and put my eyes anywhere above the floor you want
it's a game you'll always frigging lose because i'll always have a straight line from my eye to your shoes
and in fact i WILL always see your shoes
He simply moves the coin further away. And we lose sight of it.
On a flat surface.
so then the table isn't flat
don't you get this?
Obviously you don’t.
there's half the CN tower disappearing.
you go ahead and try and prove a surface is flat without optics, then you demonstrate an object being obscured by that surface, then you have a point
damn thats cool
I already explained that with the perspective ramp.
On a ball of 24,901 miles in circumference, we shouldn’t see the Sears tower, AT ALL.
On a flat surface, we see objects disappearing bottom first.
heres a close up of a basketball https://i.redd.it/znl7nrd8u8311.jpg
i guess basketballs are flat now
Uhhh what does the Sears tower have to do with this? Also I believe you mean the Willis tower.
the roundness of a basketball must be some kind of illusion caused by perspective and mirages.
The CN tower. My mistake.
And for some reason you guys don’t realize that ball has a measurable curve?
im applying flat earth logic to a basketball if that makes sense
We could in fact, measure it, and observe it once we elevate the camera. The earth is said to have curvature. But we never see it upon elevation. And we should, given it’s size.
i mean we do see it upon elevation but you guys just refuse it
I didn’t refuse it for 30 years. I do now, because I know it’s bullshit. Not merely believe, or theorize. It’s a knowing.
you can see it here and keep in mind a fish eye lens effects the whole frame https://external-preview.redd.it/sSepPdi17ZtpSdmLWOtyipQjk8if56HhFghYoxTEiro.jpg?auto=webp&s=0b9f18b34d825885ff464a9840416eb24924a781
Since many of us know it’s bullshit. We simply make fun of it now. Knowing mainstream pseudoscience can’t prove their outlandish claims. And they don’t.
