It looked like it happened after the iceberg

Now, it's magically outwards?

What you are seeing is a diffrent tear

Prove it

Still waiting

That tear has been caused since the titanic sunk

Nice theory. Sure.

Prove it

The iceberg collided beneth the waterline

You're pulling that out of your ass

That tear would be above the waterline

Again

Still pulling

Prove it

You're making a lot of assertions

Those anchors are still at full rise

And the holes are beneath them

No one has anchors at full rise beneth water

The anchors are on the same welding line as the tear

The holes are not that high

You had a tear circled in the picture

You're not following lines of perspective very well.

Go back to what you posted

Look at the circled tear

The holes are beneath the anchor and you cannot prove that these holes were of no threat to the ship.

Have you seen your own picture

Post it again

Show me how those holes were above the water and not at all a threat to the ships integrity.

What about no titanic passenger ever talked about an explosion

@solarstan yt Are you sure about that?

You better be damn sure before you get embarrassed.

Are you sure

If I was going to bomb a cruise liner I would place the bomb in the middle of the lowest deck

Aka the engine room

That is halfway up the ship

I'm not concerned with how you would do things.

Also why would anyone bomb that

Those holes were clearly caused by an explosion from the inside of the hull

Why is irrelevant. Clearly, someone did.

Did cunard do it for insurance money