Prove it

It's clearly protruding **OUTWARDS!!**

Not inwards

Because the wreck is collapsing in itself

Prove it

Still waiting

Its under high water pressure and over 100 years old

Problem is, yes. It is protruding outwards. Actual dents made by icebergs don’t easily invert back outwards once they’ve been jammed inwards.

Show me a collapsing frame that goes from an inward indentation to an outward one, rather than continuing to buckle under the already compromised area of damage.

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 that was never an inward indentation

That was undamaged

Then the wreck started collapsing

Are you daft?

The iceberg was on the outside

It's on a weld line

It hit from the outside

That was an undamaged part of the boat

Now it is tearing

Punctured **inwards**

The puncture of the ship is under the rocks

It looked like it happened after the iceberg

Now, it's magically outwards?

What you are seeing is a diffrent tear

Prove it

Still waiting

That tear has been caused since the titanic sunk

Nice theory. Sure.

Prove it

The iceberg collided beneth the waterline

You're pulling that out of your ass

That tear would be above the waterline

Again

Still pulling

Prove it

You're making a lot of assertions

Those anchors are still at full rise

And the holes are beneath them

No one has anchors at full rise beneth water

The anchors are on the same welding line as the tear

The holes are not that high