for an example, architects use math to design buildings

That's not what I'm talking about

Clearly

if they changed the properties of math on a whim, then the building would turn out very different

Again

Not what I'm talking about

you can't make the argument that math can be changed on a whim due to being a human construct

You can

What are video games?

Duh

Video games are codes

Yes

mhm

And codes can be changed

you can write different codes sure

curvature of the earth should be 7.8 inches per mile squared. that means there should be a 6-story bulge between you and a 10-mile point. But hundreds of tests over water show that bulge is nonexistent

But those codes are following linear rules

but for that particular coding language, you cannot just decide that while = else

Take out the box and your math can do so much more

that's completely nonsense

while cannot equal else in coding

What do you think theoretical quantum mechanics are exploring?

nice FECORE laser experiment Logos

never read that one before

Non linear math

hasn't been peer-reviewed yet

correct, non linear math

Math isn't set to your little box of understanding

but I'm not talking about theoreticals

https://ueyt1g.dm.files.1drv.com/y4mOUW-XFRBGsAFKBf4bLbJVUtJMjk0rX7UtjOa4i7jvrIlfZE_-zvq5HZioEZSQFOJuWXwP078e3ouStulgczn7AnKYiblRSCPupy_z3KXBlI7aEHKAccDUY9ajOd_HngZz-dNZo1aqiP76iG4gvGCLKvCmCY2ZEFFqqCeWleB1UrBphFMwAD8dhHQoOfhtkFRfRbS-ip28wKll8v-kD14JA/Curve%20%2813%29.gif?download&psid=1

We are talking about math doing anything

I'm talking about how 2 + 2 = 5 is logically inconsistent

Linearly, sure. But that's not what we've been saying.

@RidleyChozo ah, more photos to further illustrate my point

"it looks flat, so it MUST be flat"

@RidleyChozo you can see further away because of the observer's perspective.

Our reality matches with our experiences.
You cannot match your reality with your experiences.

thanks for proving how well the curvature equation works in reality