it's not a presumption

I did not assert that

that's literally what you're asserting

I did not assert that

I did not assert that

How many times es do I have to say this?

"The Earth is flat, because I cannot experience a curve. If I cannot experience a curve, then it does not match reality"

I honestly don’t see anything wrong with that.

No one ever said that

I am not concerned with how you interpret things. You will not presume things of me.

Also Derek is right

but that's the argument you've been making this whole time

showing pictures of a "flat plane"

You will never experience a spinning ball

"water always finds its level"

"it looks flat, so it MUST be flat"

Show us otherwise

>>mute @Pwnelius

<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully muted **boomboomguy5**#2603

Enough quoting

Not happening

Yeah, that was getting exhausting.

If earth is a ball, he has to prove how water doesn’t conform to its container, how the earth does curve, especially when we are supposed to see it at the stated size.

Otherwise, he’s just arguing from hypotheticals he can’t prove.

He’s all messaging me saying how gravity is responsible for it all.

Eh...

been a while

hm

should i get involved?

wait wait wait, guy makes good point, flat earth moderator doesnt like it. >>MUTE HIM

A theory is not a good point when proof is the requirement.

You want proof when every time i provide its fake or you have another explanation which when debunked it horseshit

Hello there

hello

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMfcoT_lO80 @Derek Nelson there is your blue planet 😃

Yes. Mainstream pseudoscience provides mountains of theories, which unfortunately does not equate to proof.

you can watch it live

your planet... right now

Why would I want to watch something where they’ve been caught red handed faking curvature?

**earth chan isn't flat**

she's more round than my mom