Yep

jsut a super thin one

To ionize a hydrogen atom and give it a positive charge it would literally be just one proton and one neutron

hydrgogen is fake to me

water is a postiiev nd negtive charge

I'm going with "government's lying to us about the theory of nuclear science"

but....

"There's some quote unquote radioactive firefighter clothes in a hospital basement in Pripyat"

Lemme show you a redox reaction

not oxygen and hydrogen

https://images.app.goo.gl/tqF2u8bmc8P2XRiA9

The very top is a reaction that would give you a positive hydrogen ion

Well the Sievert is a very strange unit

meters squared per second squared

The only problem is it's bonded to chlorine

Maybe a different gas is a better idea

bro

you get 2 "gassses" from water

the only thing you know is they behave different

sievert Sv equivalent dose (of ionizing radiation) J/kg m2⋅s−2

What a strange unit

Area per time squared

what is that?

wht?

It's what the device actually reads

area per time???

sieverts per hour

wtf

area per time squared per unit time

Because remember the device reads sieverts per hour

is that like mile sper hour but instead of miles its land??>

I'm telling you something smells like shit in the instrumentation for detecting ionizing radiation

No datasheet

Strange unit

Bro

i agree

area over time

loll

I mean you would think the unit should be luminousity, gamma rays per square centimeter per minute

Ionized gas is impossible with a redox reaction

It can only be a solution or a solid

This device is supposed to detect
alpha (ionized helium gas)
beta (electrons)
gamma (high frequency X rays)