It is a good reaction

But this doesn't make sense, because of the way how statistics work

I didn't necessarily mean allergic, but I meant if there's a bad reaction to it

A blood test can check a person's immunity against certain diseases (such as chickenpox, measles, mumps, rubella and hepatitis B). This can help the doctor decide if immunisation is appropriate. If you do not have written records of which vaccines you have had, a doctor may look for scars.

There cannot be a bad reaction other than allergic or in very very few cases an infection

This makes no sense my friend

If we can do this ^ how come we can't see compability with vaccines

What do you mean?

Vaccines can cause mutations in our blood

No

Not true

Vaccines only contain a very weak form of the disease

There is no evidence that anything in that vaccine can cause mutations

Since 2008, SCPI has been ahead of the field, doing the cutting edge biology, molecular modeling, computational informatics, and ecology to figure out what is causing so many DNA breaks and mutations in our children, long before the 2011 and 2012 publications put the hundreds of de novo mutations together. That’s because we knew that a condition associated with hundreds of different genes could not possibly be genetic. We knew that DNA and retroviral contaminants are present in some childhood vaccines and that these types of contaminants are known to cause DNA breaks and mutations.

Children vaccines causing it hmmmmmmm

https://www.soundchoice.org/research/

If you say, mercury can cause mutations, vaccines may contain mercury therefore vaccines cause mutation this would be a false claim

And let me just take a look at this study

https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/when-vaccines-turn-vicious-40743

I'm not saying vaccines should be terminated

Just saying we should have a compability test

https://respectfulinsolence.com/2015/08/24/more-horrible-antivaccine-science-from-theresa-deisher/

Here you can see

That your stated webside is very very weak

Not really scientific and "dubious" correlations

Have we created the perfect storm for DNA breaks, mutations, and regressive autism in our children? In 1979 we started injecting our children with vaccines that are contaminated with human fetal DNA fragments and a retrovirus, and autism began to rise. Then we added more jabs with aborted fetal vaccines and thimerosal, which can also cause DNA breaks, to vaccines in 1988, and autism rose more. Then in 1995, we added much more aborted fetal DNA contaminants to the chickenpox vaccine, and autism really rose. And now we have children born to older dads who have sperm with very breakable DNA. Aborted fetal contaminated vaccines plus thimerosal plus older dads result in more DNA breaks, thus more de novo mutations, in our children.

This paragraph just screams UNSCIENTIFIC

You wouldn't be able to prevent anything wiht a compatibility test

First of all

She claims that all childhood vaccines cause this type of mutation, so a test is nonsense

How much are you getting paid :)

And also, a test makes no sense statistically

Unfortunetly, my friend, I don't get anything

I am just a fairly well read person on scientific work and medicine

Gonna start studying this year

Start?

You are claiming we aren't true but you've done no study?

Ok, so we should be able to get a test even if it makes statistically no sense

You think they care?

They'll get more money! They should be happy!

My friend