I think you do not know what vaccines really are

Why would I need to see if you are "compatible" with you

What exactly needs to be compatible?

To see if certain ingredients don't cause an allergic reaction in your body

Okay, so most ingredients do not cause any allergic reactions

Some could, but still, it doesn't make sense to always test before

The problem is when the nurse asks you what youre allergic to (you more than likely do not know yourself) and its taken under the assumption you arent allergic to any of the vaccine ingredients

Because the fatal risks of vaccines are soooooooooooooooo low

So there is always a chance present

They should be able to get your blood use the vaccine on the sample and see what happens

Do you guys know why the doctor doesn't test you on everything

@Abe Lover This doesn't work like that

Your blood does not cause allergic reactions

The allergic reactions are caused by a sudden release of histamin that can cause severe reavtions

I always tell someone who doesnt like vaccines to sneeze on a pro mandatory vacciner 😋

YOu would need to do an alergy test, to verify you are allergic to a component

It is a good reaction

But this doesn't make sense, because of the way how statistics work

I didn't necessarily mean allergic, but I meant if there's a bad reaction to it

A blood test can check a person's immunity against certain diseases (such as chickenpox, measles, mumps, rubella and hepatitis B). This can help the doctor decide if immunisation is appropriate. If you do not have written records of which vaccines you have had, a doctor may look for scars.

There cannot be a bad reaction other than allergic or in very very few cases an infection

This makes no sense my friend

If we can do this ^ how come we can't see compability with vaccines

What do you mean?

Vaccines can cause mutations in our blood

No

Not true

Vaccines only contain a very weak form of the disease

There is no evidence that anything in that vaccine can cause mutations

Since 2008, SCPI has been ahead of the field, doing the cutting edge biology, molecular modeling, computational informatics, and ecology to figure out what is causing so many DNA breaks and mutations in our children, long before the 2011 and 2012 publications put the hundreds of de novo mutations together. That’s because we knew that a condition associated with hundreds of different genes could not possibly be genetic. We knew that DNA and retroviral contaminants are present in some childhood vaccines and that these types of contaminants are known to cause DNA breaks and mutations.

Children vaccines causing it hmmmmmmm

https://www.soundchoice.org/research/

If you say, mercury can cause mutations, vaccines may contain mercury therefore vaccines cause mutation this would be a false claim

And let me just take a look at this study

https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/when-vaccines-turn-vicious-40743

I'm not saying vaccines should be terminated

Just saying we should have a compability test

https://respectfulinsolence.com/2015/08/24/more-horrible-antivaccine-science-from-theresa-deisher/

Here you can see

That your stated webside is very very weak

Not really scientific and "dubious" correlations