Message from @Human Sheeple
Discord ID: 595500145307549737
@Timebomb I’m waiting for you to prove me wrong
Sleep
Do you take me for a physicist?
So I assume you cannot prove gravity
You do not have to be one to prove gravity
light curves up
It's getting late and I have to go to sleep. Be sleep now
Have you brought that image to a physicist yet?
"Strictly speaking, gravity is NOT A "FORCE..."
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/grav_speed.html
I’d be interested to hear their thoughts
It isn't a force
Gravity is a force, I believe
No it's not
You realize gravity is the thing keeping us in the pull of the sun supplying our planet with sunlight and also keeping everything on the planet right?
Gravity kind of is in one way and isn’t in another
There are two main theories
Or maybe it isn't, school was long ago
page 11:
"The nonlinear equations of motion used in this model are general six-degree-of-freedom equations representing the flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat nonrotating earth"
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88248main_H-1777.pdf
In GR, It's a psuedo force.
page:12
"aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over flat nonrotating earth"
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88072main_H-1259.pdf
page 108:
aircraft flying over flat, nonrotating earth
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890005752.pdf
One is attraction, the other is kind of like a heavy person standing in the middle of the trampoline and marbles roll around him
page 126:
The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations with stationary atmosphere and flat, nonrotating earth assumptions.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890007066.pdf
page 2:
The method is limited, however, to application where a flat, nonrotating earth may be assumed.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19720012071.pdf
Wow this place really is an echo chamber lol
page 32:
Lastly, the equations of motion for the zeroth-order problem of flight in a vacuum over a flat Earth are presented.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19940020279.pdf
page14:
a) The earth is flat and non-rotating.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19790005472.pdf
page 25:
The helicopter equations of motion are given in body axes with rerpect to a flat, nonrotating Earth.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19810003557.pdf
If the earth is flat, shouldn't the temperature be the same across the whole planet
page 13:
A model frequently used is that of a flat, nonrotating earth.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19650015408.pdf
page 19:
These equations assume a rigid vehicle and a flat, nonrotating Earth.
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88733main_H-2465.pdf
page 14:
(2) A flat, nonrotating earth
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710018599.pdf
Newtonian gravity is a force. GR is the curvature of spacetime.
page2:
In our minimum time-to-climb problem, the aircraft is modeled as a point mass and the flight trajectory is strictly confined in a vertical plane on a non-rotating, flat earth.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060053337.pdf
page 8:
the missile position in space is computed relative to a flat nonrotating earth.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20040008097.pdf
You want more?
That moment when NASA confesses flat earth
That's a lot of papers that "flat earthers dont have".
No
lmao
No, please no more lol