You are wrong, mixing science and scientism

Hmmm

they like to ride his dick from what i saw yesterday

bro

the earth is round

theres literal proof

satalites

the moon

It's a common misconception that science proves things. This is probably because that type of stuff is not covered much in science classes.

and plus if u think about it

You can say there is proof but when we do it doesn't exist? Hypocritical nonsense, all your so called proof has been debunked, the moon has nothing to do with curvature of earth

Nor do balloon satellites

Science can disprove things. Science can support a hypothesis. As you do this multiple times, there gets to be an accumulation of evidence. When there is a large amount of evidence in favor of something and little or none against something we gain confidence.

bruh how tf does day and night exist if the earth is flat

There is a difference between a theory, law, and observation.

where does the sun go and where does the moon go if the earth is so flat

A theory is a hypothesis supported by multiple repeats of an experiment

wouldnt it just be sun and moon at the same time?

A Law is a mathematical formula that holds up to reality

An observation is self explanatory

Yes, self explanatory

what about newton's law then

PEople often think a Theory is just a hunch. This is quite incorrect. https://www.livescience.com/20896-science-scientific-method.html

explain to me how newton's law is incorrect

It is not proven, none of your globe nonsense is proven

Science does not deal in proofs

Disproving a law is in fact very easy just find a situation where you plug in the numbers and they dont add up

BRUH

Can you name one thing that science has proven?

Density

Science can't prove anything and it never claimed it could

Please cite your proof claim.

This argument is so pointless

I already defined all terms now let's move on

You people jumping on the banwagon, real herd mentality, when when the herd is running off a cliff

i cant explain the proof but can you?

give me proof the earth is flat

no

It is simply a methodology for tweaking your confidence that one hypothesis could accurately reflect reality. Your confidence can never reach 100%, it can only approach it.

give me an observation since thats self eplanatory