there is no 'force'

It would follow from that that if no force were applied things would seperate slowly.... or not at all

Im leaning towards not at all

Archimedes Principle. It's a principle of nature. Things equalize in the closed system of varying densities which we all live in.

Fran's right. With no force to separate densities, there's no buoyancy. Here's an example:
https://youtu.be/rzytpxtbCzQ?t=157

You didn't offer explanation under your model why things in a centrifuge separate quicker

because it's irrelevant to the question of helium balloons

not connected at all to what we're talking about

Its obviously is relevant, they both deal with differing densities and bouyancy

do they not?

and you're bringing it up to dodge

but

what was your point?

centrifuges have a force offered from a machine?

If we spin something in a centrifuge and apply a force to it we can get things to seperate very quickly, things which would take hundreds of years to seperate just left sitting

It seems the more force we apply the quicker it settles

If we apply no force, what would happen?

Would it settle and seperate?

Archimedes Principle would happen

But we just said that the less force we apply the longer it takes...

densities would equalize

If we applied no force surely it would never seperate

Guys ever heard of something called a SPACE SHIP I mean it's not ROCKET SCIENCE

And archimedes principle is stated in terms of forces and weights

not masses

is this supposed to be an argument?

Can you define archimedes principal in your own words for me

time waster

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/428069/Naked-man-filmed-climbing-Buckingham-Palace-top-floor-window

I do not want to misrepresent you

obnoxious

Looks like a man

Idk about kid

Typical

But whatever

You can see a little better if you zoom in

But ofc ik you guys will disagree and say kid anyway

I thought it was a man

on first glance

It is

But they'll say kid because you know pedo ring apperantly