Message from @Fran
Discord ID: 595739017224519691
that vid is evidence of elite child trafficking
Ok
that boy fell to his death trying to escape
But still
Didn't need to see a minor
It quite literally is archimedes principal, which is null and void if no force is being applied downward.
archimedes principle implies that objects seek equilibrium based on density. no force required.
no gravity required.
No, Force is required... Unless you disagree with Newton?
gravity is fake and gay
You also didnt explain why things with greater forces applied seem to seperate faster
you might describe something falling as a measurement of 'gravity' if you like, but it's simply cosmetic.
there is no 'force'
It would follow from that that if no force were applied things would seperate slowly.... or not at all
Im leaning towards not at all
Archimedes Principle. It's a principle of nature. Things equalize in the closed system of varying densities which we all live in.
Fran's right. With no force to separate densities, there's no buoyancy. Here's an example:
https://youtu.be/rzytpxtbCzQ?t=157
You didn't offer explanation under your model why things in a centrifuge separate quicker
because it's irrelevant to the question of helium balloons
not connected at all to what we're talking about
do they not?
and you're bringing it up to dodge
but
what was your point?
centrifuges have a force offered from a machine?
If we spin something in a centrifuge and apply a force to it we can get things to seperate very quickly, things which would take hundreds of years to seperate just left sitting
It seems the more force we apply the quicker it settles
If we apply no force, what would happen?
Would it settle and seperate?
Archimedes Principle would happen
But we just said that the less force we apply the longer it takes...
densities would equalize
If we applied no force surely it would never seperate
Guys ever heard of something called a SPACE SHIP I mean it's not ROCKET SCIENCE
And archimedes principle is stated in terms of forces and weights
not masses
Can you define archimedes principal in your own words for me
time waster