@mouny a website isnt proof

Well stop being such a skeptic sometimes

your jsut says the same tjhing we did

LOOK AT THE RESPONSES MATE

"you split it into 2 different gases"

If you guys want a complete undergraduate level overview of physics research this http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/

that contradicts the point u just said about saing no to everything lmao

👍

thats not proof if O and H

it is

They won’t look at it @Fran

could be - and +

@Fran Even Feynmann couldn't explain the parallel plate dielectric experiment

@rightthehand However, it does provide sufficient evidence in the article to prove the writers point. That could be essential

but then we can burn the oxygen to make C02

What is that

what would that mean @rightthehand

you dont make co2

you can

lol

You could

@rightthehand do you know why the O is slightly negative and the H is slightly positive?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ivggE9Mj3I

you jsut assert the things you ahve been told are corret

that literally sounds like the definition of a capacitor

ngl

literally burning any hydrocarbon will give u CO2, unless it's an incomplete reaction

Water has been shown to form when anything that contains two moles of hydrogen atoms combusted will happen to form 18 grams of water when combusted completely in an oxygen-rich environment

ffs

This is why we take high school chemistry. You have a fundamental misunderstanding about matters that completely make your argument sound crazy

yoru jsut repeating what you said

@mouny When did anybody count 6x10^23 atoms?

I do politics so this really isn’t my sort is subject ngl

When you can't even count one of them?

how do you know "oxygen" rich isnt highly poitive

ok

kill

me

@TheDestiel Great when are you sending the synagogue of satan meddlers in politics back to IsraHELL?

poltiicis lololololol@TheDestiel

Wait what cant be explained about that experiment?