Message from @hawk jungle
Discord ID: 598003680104415252
The ones we can measure? That there’s a downward acceleration of 9.8m per sec per sec?
that effect is fine
the globe claims others
they call the law because its an constant.
the cause is unknown, cant ascribe nade to an unknown factor
What does the globe claim about it?
that it would change on an FE, like in that crazy vsauce video
Right
and a lot of the globe model and space relies on other parts of it i guess
I’m trying to figure out a way for it to work on a flat earth
With mass attracts mass
It can’t be a disk that’s for sure
most i've seen don't believe mass attracts mass (if they're fe). good luck though :p
Maybe with a giant cilinder
**Question Of The Day #132**
Are the Nazis still alive and well in Antarctica?
Tell us what you think in the <#484514023698726912> 😃
And we’re on top of the cilinder
@raspberry some of them do though haha like bob knodel and mark sargent
i didn't know mark did lol, figures
Well he thinks it’s machined
naziz just evolved and developped better brainwash techniques, war wasnt working, now its a war for your mind
With giant gravity making machines under the earth
it is an info and mind war
Personally i think the flat earth is a psy op. Because it links all other conspiracy theories into it
I think it’s allowed to muddy the waters
flat earth is direct measurements
Which measurements?
https://www.metabunk.org/curve/
we have measured the earth water surface to be flat and not curving with direct measurements, the globe model predicts 8 inches per miles squared, for example : 8x10x10 = 800 inches of drop in 10 miles thats 20.3 meters of drop over a spawn of 16 km, when we measure over this distance there is no drop at al, so no curvature equals flat
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrV1BQhaufM-PsEtMjjehDQ/videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2zhK5paB5U
https://youtu.be/uJ3TLdcVNfA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ujL4424Nsg&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR3Qc_rsubhAMEheBjM4vunjxoueZQW3wRqQvZFy09Wc9sJ9VxROJ4bCslY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ujL4424Nsg&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR3Qc_rsubhAMEheBjM4vunjxoueZQW3wRqQvZFy09Wc9sJ9VxROJ4bCslY
19.25 meters of refracted hidden, thats the height of a 6 story building
yet we see to the base over a distance of 22 km where there should be 19.25 meters of refracted hidden curvature according to the globe model.
if you account maximum refraction possible, the lighthouse still should be 8 meters obscured by the supposed curvature
the lighthouse is 1 meter above sea level,
the focal hight of the light house is 30 meters above sea level
cape florida lighthouse, Key Biscayne footage taken
with a nikon p1000 camera from blackpoint 22.1 km distance
focal hight=height of the lamp of a lighthouse from water level
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/557318461819453451/597873047940366366/zero_curvature.1..jpeg
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/557318461819453451/597873063790379010/zero_curvature1.0.jpeg
This is shotgun argumentation bro
This pile as much as you can in one go
watch it
zero curvature
So these are all just looking through a telescope or camera. And then compare it to a calculator that has errors
You said you had actual measurements
Where did you measure the surface of the water?
laser measurements
Are you saying a laser can’t bend?
thats not even an argument,
It makes your argument invalid is what it does
How did you or they measure something with a laser?