what college you go to 97

only the intelligent ones

Now, if you try to introduce the famous gravity to the mix it completely breaks down and fails. Mainly due to the fact that general relativity is orchestrated in a pseudo reimannian manifold with a metric tensor. While QFT is set in minkowski spacetime.

So without getting into math (you can't handle that) the actual curvature of spacetime is the main issue.

I smell fallacies

Grabbity in other words, right?

Therefore general relativity was seen as incomplete causing physicist to try and create a theory that reconciles QFT and GR. String theory was one, LQG the other.

Among others, these theories have never been experimentally proven and are still ad hoc.

You realize in terms of supermassive objects such as the Earth it is common practice to use relativity. It works practically in every scenario. Quantum Physics doesnt disprove the globe you moron

So basically the physicist know "einstein's grabbity" is a broken theory but they hold onto it in hope's that "tommorow a miracle will make it consistent".

In other words, gravity is pseudoscience and contradicts other proven fields of physics.

Alright im done with you. I need to speak with your "professor" did they find him off the street?

what college you go to mate

@thing man, you have a ton of ignorance

Or maybe you fell asleep in basic physics class?

which one?

For a junior in HS this guy sure has a massive ego

yes, well there's always space for a new theory isn't there since their current one falls apart

hi noobs

@thing okay here's your claim "You realize in terms of supermassive objects such as the Earth it is common practice to use relativity. It works practically in every scenario. Quantum Physics doesnt disprove the globe you moron"

Now prove it mathematically

Im sorry, but when im talking to a FLAT EARTHER how can I take your arguments seriously

ugh u all so weird

ikr

You mean that because you can't formulate a response you're resorting to ad homs? Alright.

no need for CAPS

damn another globie bites the dust

flat earther will suffice

and i oop

What im saying is, if you had a physics course, yet you can understand a fundamental error in your "model" then you aren't worthy of an actual scientific response

why are you writing it in caps? almost like you're putting us up onto a pedastal

ooo nobody are u gonna mute hi

There are many more errors in your supposed model that anyone who had a physics course would scoff at

@thing what I'm saying is, you have no idea what I've just said so you're resorting to meaningless ad homs. I'm still waiting for you to mathematically prove that gravity works on all scales and to mathematically disprove everything I said.

no need to do that you know,, we're all equal here

@thing just out of curiosity, do you even know what a tensor is

and i oop

soon @murp the way things are heading 😉

You obviously like to search up terms on google and act like you know what they mean. And a tensor is a simple basic array in physics that can describe positions of certain objects

lol

oof