Probably through trial and custody costs

Yup.

"The greatest costs associated with the death penalty occur prior to and during trial, not in post-conviction proceedings."

Oh right, but then its not the death itself, so that cost would be there regardless of him going to prison or killed

^^^

Well said

Yes, but why not just send them to prison for there lifetime.

Because that costs more than pulling a trigger

They don't shoot the person..

Doesn't matter, you still get what I mean

Although I don't enjoy killing people, sometimes it should be done

Yes, but there is most likely a ton of innocent people who get framed who dies.

and you can't bring them back to life.

Like I said

The dilemma is whether to get rid of all criminals and maybe kill a few innocents, or to let all innocents go and possibly a few criminals too

In my opinion I'll choose the first

Also innocent people aren't exempt for jailing as much as capital punishment

The best solution is a better justice system

The Death Penalty is only really ok(in my opinion) if the person has killed many people, or a very important person.

many has in more then 5.

Naw

I'd say an eye for an eye

Not literally though

More like a life for a life

Karmic justice

Not just that but cost savings too

So, let's say someone is drunk, and they kill someone while they are drunk. Do you think they should have the Death Penalty?

no

the death penalty should not exist

Thank you.

That’s not murder

That’s manslaughter

the earth is a hexagon

Well I was exaggerating when I said karmic justice

its still murder

WeabooツGarbage#8008 Stop spamming! This is warning number 2

Of course you have to take in the circumstances

i rekon

√

It’s manslaughter

Not murder