The Death Penalty is only really ok(in my opinion) if the person has killed many people, or a very important person.

many has in more then 5.

Naw

I'd say an eye for an eye

Not literally though

More like a life for a life

Karmic justice

Not just that but cost savings too

So, let's say someone is drunk, and they kill someone while they are drunk. Do you think they should have the Death Penalty?

no

the death penalty should not exist

Thank you.

That’s not murder

That’s manslaughter

the earth is a hexagon

Well I was exaggerating when I said karmic justice

its still murder

WeabooツGarbage#8008 Stop spamming! This is warning number 2

Of course you have to take in the circumstances

i rekon

√

It’s manslaughter

Not murder

Your alcohol intake is still your responsibility

if you intentionaly kill somebody, that is murder. if it is an accident its not

drunk does not save you

^

& rapist or pedophiles don’t need the death penalty they get taken care of by the inmates

^ True.

but that is a harsh way of death.

It’s worse being in there with that label

Tru.

It’s mandatory for the white gangs & mexican gangs in prison to leave you in snitches if you’re a pedophile

You have to be marked

& then you’ll do you’re time in pc where you’ll basically go crazy

When I say karmic justice it's not really for the purpose of karma

It's to stop someone from hurting more people

Capital punishment is to save money

There's my argument in a nutshell

Now that my argument is organized, any disputes? @Cookie

Who’s the best dictator in history